On W 21 Jan, 2009, at 06:34 , Sophia Alikhani wrote:
Hi
I used qmail + dovecot-1.1.7 + dovecot-sieve +
now everything works well but there are many spam in Bulk folders from
every user address to their address for example
from
us...@mydomain to us...@mydomain
in the real the sender and re
On T 20 Jan, 2009, at 12:38 , Steffen Kaiser wrote:
So you can hack sendmail. Exim, too, if I remember correctly.
I would not call that hack in exim case though. It is possible to
avoid all backscatter, first of all by avoiding delivery by an
external programme*. This will still leave the
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 08:26:37AM +0200, Dimitrios Karapiperis wrote:
> I would like to ask if there is adequate mechanism to authenticate users
> through POP3 against Active Directory by Outlook Express so that users will
> authenticate seamlessly using logon credentials.
>
> I have implemented
Hello all
I would like to ask if there is adequate mechanism to authenticate users
through POP3 against Active Directory by Outlook Express so that users will
authenticate seamlessly using logon credentials.
I have implemented LDAP authentication but users must supply their
credentials to Outloo
Hi
I used qmail + dovecot-1.1.7 + dovecot-sieve +
now everything works well but there are many spam in Bulk folders from
every user address to their address for example
from
us...@mydomain to us...@mydomain
in the real the sender and reciever are the same .
they are spam but since everyday ,
Hello list,
We are in the process of exploring the idea of moving from UFS with
fs-quota to using softquotas in Dovecot (probably Maildir type, stored
in LDAP, all ontop of NFS).
I have it setup, and it works rather well so far.
But there is one situation we can currently support, which I c
On 1/20/2009 5:44 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> Well, okay, I was thinking about a way to not duplicate the message to
>>> everyone's mailbox. And I guess with virtual mailboxes there's the
>>> problem that users can't then delete the message (or it gets deleted for
>>> everyone).
>> A shared mailb
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 08:28, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 23:18 +0100, Maciej Uhlig wrote:
> > Timo Sirainen:
> > > What exactly are they? I guess a global file that is served as a message
> > > for all users?
> > Right. With POP3 it is served once - after first user login after t
Charles Marcus:
no?
Should work with both IMAP _and_ POP3.
Best regards,
MU
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 17:39 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 1/20/2009, Timo Sirainen (t...@iki.fi) wrote:
> > Well, okay, I was thinking about a way to not duplicate the message to
> > everyone's mailbox. And I guess with virtual mailboxes there's the
> > problem that users can't then delete the
That makes a lot of sense.
Thanks!!
-N
On Jan 20, 2009, at 2:37 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 14:19 -0800, Noah Silverman wrote:
Even stranger is that we don't see any of the debug information in
the
logs even though we've set all the debug options to true.
..
dovecot:
On 1/20/2009, Timo Sirainen (t...@iki.fi) wrote:
> Well, okay, I was thinking about a way to not duplicate the message to
> everyone's mailbox. And I guess with virtual mailboxes there's the
> problem that users can't then delete the message (or it gets deleted for
> everyone).
A shared mailbox na
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 14:19 -0800, Noah Silverman wrote:
> Even stranger is that we don't see any of the debug information in the
> logs even though we've set all the debug options to true.
..
> dovecot: Jan 20 14:09:20 Info: imap-login: Disconnected (no auth
> attempts): rip=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx, l
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 23:18 +0100, Maciej Uhlig wrote:
> Timo Sirainen:
> > What exactly are they? I guess a global file that is served as a message
> > for all users?
> Right. With POP3 it is served once - after first user login after the
> message was placed in bulletin database (just a plainte
On 1/20/2009, Maciej Uhlig (maciej.uh...@us.edu.pl) wrote:
> As a long term user of qpopper with bulletins, I'd like to know if
> the bulletin feature is planned for dovecot? I really miss bulletins
> :-) , this is very convenient way of providing information to users.
Interesting idea... but is
Hi,
We're having some really weird auth problems trying to setup a very
basic dovecot imap server.
Even stranger is that we don't see any of the debug information in the
logs even though we've set all the debug options to true.
Can anybody provide some suggestions.
Thanks,
-Noah
--
Timo Sirainen:
What exactly are they? I guess a global file that is served as a message
for all users?
Right. With POP3 it is served once - after first user login after the
message was placed in bulletin database (just a plaintext file in a
directory, for instance).
That's more difficult to
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 23:02 +0100, Peter Lindgren wrote:
> Timo Sirainen skrev:
> > On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 22:35 +0100, Peter Lindgren wrote:
> >> The new server seems to have this function on by default, can I force
> >> this renaming (by will or by mistake)?
> >
> > Dovecot v1.1 will add the ,W=
Timo Sirainen skrev:
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 22:35 +0100, Peter Lindgren wrote:
The new server seems to have this function on by default, can I force
this renaming (by will or by mistake)?
Dovecot v1.1 will add the ,W= file sizes to file names always, it's not
configurable. But it works fine eve
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 22:57 +0100, Maciej Uhlig wrote:
> As a long term user of qpopper with bulletins, I'd like to know if the
> bulletin feature is planned for dovecot? I really miss bulletins :-),
> this is very convenient way of providing information to users.
What exactly are they? I guess
As a long term user of qpopper with bulletins, I'd like to know if the
bulletin feature is planned for dovecot? I really miss bulletins :-),
this is very convenient way of providing information to users.
Best regards,
MU
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 22:35 +0100, Peter Lindgren wrote:
> Timo Sirainen skrev:
> > On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 22:04 +0100, Peter Lindgren wrote:
> >> 3) 1.0.rc29 did not store the message size in the file name as later
> >> versions. When will Dovecot do the check and rename the files to include
> >>
Hi all,
I am running Dovecot v1.1.7 in a relatively quiet and calm environment.
Suddenly overnight cron job has started throwing out errors like:
/usr/sbin/dovecot --exec-mail ext /usr/lib/dovecot/expire-tool
Error: userdb(us...@mail.example) didn't return a home directory
Error: userdb(us...@m
Timo Sirainen skrev:
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 22:04 +0100, Peter Lindgren wrote:
3) 1.0.rc29 did not store the message size in the file name as later
versions. When will Dovecot do the check and rename the files to include
the message size? There are some folders with quite large number of
messag
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 22:04 +0100, Peter Lindgren wrote:
> Hello!
> I am moving my mail from the old server with 1.0.rc29 to a brand new
> server with 1.1.7. I use Maildir in both servers. A few questions:
>
> 1) The new server has another name, can I just copy the mail files
> as-is, will the s
Hello!
I am moving my mail from the old server with 1.0.rc29 to a brand new
server with 1.1.7. I use Maildir in both servers. A few questions:
1) The new server has another name, can I just copy the mail files
as-is, will the server name in the file names matter?
2) The new server has a diff
Timo Sirainen:
But the point is
that plaintext authentication (PLAIN or LOGIN auth mechanism) can verify
the password against ANY schema.
I see. Many thanks for this explanation :-)
Best regards,
MU
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 21:42 +0100, Maciej Uhlig wrote:
> Timo Sirainen:
> > If the password is the same in both cases, you can simply use a single
> > CRAM-MD5 scheme. Dovecot can do plaintext authentication against all
> > schemes just fine.
> >
> Actually I happen not to understand the above :
Timo Sirainen:
If the password is the same in both cases, you can simply use a single
CRAM-MD5 scheme. Dovecot can do plaintext authentication against all
schemes just fine.
Actually I happen not to understand the above :-( I thought PLAIN is a
plaintext schema while CRAM-MD5 is non-plaintex
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 21:15 +0100, Maciej Uhlig wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > I've implemented it (or actually something that's a bit more generic)
> > this far: http://dovecot.org/patches/1.2/auth-multi-password.diff
> >
> > But IIRC it's still missing things and I decided it's not worth the
>
Timo Sirainen wrote:
I've implemented it (or actually something that's a bit more generic)
this far: http://dovecot.org/patches/1.2/auth-multi-password.diff
But IIRC it's still missing things and I decided it's not worth the
effort right now.
I see. FYI I'd like to allow an user to authentica
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 21:02 +0100, Maciej Uhlig wrote:
> Timo wrote : "In future it's possible that Dovecot could support
> multiple passwords in different schemes for a single user.".
>
> Is it planned in the nearest future? :-)
I've implemented it (or actually something that's a bit more gener
Timo wrote : "In future it's possible that Dovecot could support
multiple passwords in different schemes for a single user.".
Is it planned in the nearest future? :-)
Best regards,
MU
Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Steffen Kaiser пишет:
Does these problems occure all the time, e.g. if you restart the
Dovecot demon and there are just a bunch of users on it.
After restart - it work for some time, but it is just because no all
connect to it again.
Do you have a file descriptor lim
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 22:52 +0300, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
> But it makes me think what it is real will be good if dovecot can say in
> debuging loging what he reach some limits from his config.
Pretty much everything such thing does log an error/warning, except when
login process max count is re
Steffen Kaiser пишет:
Does these problems occure all the time, e.g. if you restart the
Dovecot demon and there are just a bunch of users on it.
After restart - it work for some time, but it is just because no all
connect to it again.
Do you have a file descriptor limit for the demon process?
Timo Sirainen пишет:
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 11:09 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 1/20/2009, Timo Sirainen (t...@iki.fi) wrote:
It doesn't show it, because you're using the default value for it.
Ahh...
Which brings up a repeat request for alphabetical sorting of the output
of do
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 1/20/2009, Seth Mattinen (se...@rollernet.us) wrote:
It's simply a fact these days that people find backscatter and
misdirected bounces annoying. In many cases they end up at a forged
address that had nothing to do with the original transaction. A well
behaved receiver
On 1/20/2009, Seth Mattinen (se...@rollernet.us) wrote:
> It's simply a fact these days that people find backscatter and
> misdirected bounces annoying. In many cases they end up at a forged
> address that had nothing to do with the original transaction. A well
> behaved receiver will make decis
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 11:00 -0800, JANE CUA wrote:
> Hi Timo,
>
> I believe disabling file locking will fix the problem. I have search other
> sites about file locking and sendmail, file locking may cause sendmail to do
> Denial of Service. I have to get people to use the new squirrelmail +
>
It's simply a fact these days that people find backscatter and
misdirected bounces annoying. In many cases they end up at a forged
address that had nothing to do with the original transaction. A well
behaved receiver will make decisions during the SMTP transactions with
appropriate response cod
Hi Timo,
I believe disabling file locking will fix the problem. I have search other
sites about file locking and sendmail, file locking may cause sendmail to do
Denial of Service. I have to get people to use the new squirrelmail + Dovecot
server again.
Is there a great chance the files would
On 1/20/2009 11:23 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> Which brings up a repeat request for alphabetical sorting of the output
>> of dovecot -n and dovecot -a (makes it very easy to find settings and to
>> make sure you aren't missing something), and for a new -d option to
>> output only the default settin
Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Jan 20, 2009, at 6:05 AM, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
But dovecot -n don`t show things like a login_max_processes_count and
other thing what I think must be a bootle neck.
It doesn't show it, because you're using the default value for it.
Anyway i
Am Dienstag 20 Januar 2009 schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 07:21 +0100, Wilhelm Meier wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am Montag 19 Januar 2009 schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> > > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 18:32 +0100, Wilhelm Meier wrote:
> > > > kmail instead seems to have some problems: if I save a ma
On 1/20/2009 11:23 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> Which brings up a repeat request for alphabetical sorting of the
>> output of dovecot -n and dovecot -a (makes it very easy to find
>> settings and to make sure you aren't missing something), and for a
>> new -d option to output only the default settin
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 14:36 -0200, Giorgenes Gelatti wrote:
> Created dotlock file's timestamp is different than current time (1232468644
> vs 1232468524): /path/to/dovecot.index.log
>
> The IT guy swears the clocks are sincronized.
the difference in the above message is exactly 120 seconds. Are
Hi there,
I'm getting a lot of this message in production log:
Created dotlock file's timestamp is different than current time (1232468644
vs 1232468524): /path/to/dovecot.index.log
The IT guy swears the clocks are sincronized.
Whe even have made a test in the machine running dovecot, inside the
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 11:09 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 1/20/2009, Timo Sirainen (t...@iki.fi) wrote:
> > It doesn't show it, because you're using the default value for it.
>
> Ahh...
>
> Which brings up a repeat request for alphabetical sorting of the output
> of dovecot -n and dovecot -a
On 1/20/2009, Steffen Kaiser (skdove...@smail.inf.fh-brs.de) wrote:
> In order to handle Charles's idea, Dovecot deliver is to return "No
> error" and send no DSN in case of failure.
? Not sure where you got that idea...
If Timos idea was in fact to 'pass-thru' these status codes, I'm all in
favo
On 1/20/2009, Timo Sirainen (t...@iki.fi) wrote:
> It doesn't show it, because you're using the default value for it.
Ahh...
Which brings up a repeat request for alphabetical sorting of the output
of dovecot -n and dovecot -a (makes it very easy to find settings and to
make sure you aren't missin
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 10:52 -0500, Stewart Dean wrote:
> > Jan 14 11:49:23 mercury mail:warn|warning dovecot: imap-login: SSL_read()
> > syscall failed: Connection reset by peer [69.180.200.184]
> > Jan 14 11:52:28 mercury mail:warn|warning dovecot: imap-login: SSL_read()
> > syscall failed: Conn
Last Wednesday at 12:21 I made this switch, which seemed to be
uneventful. In any case, no user has reported problems since the
migration. Not content to leave well enough alone, this morning I
scanned the syslog and maillog for dovecot related errors. What I found
was that:
Before the Migr
Steffen Kaiser:
> RFC5321 sec 4.2.4
>
> the same wording about:
>
> o if attempts to deliver the message fail due to permanent
>conditions, or if repeated attempts to deliver the message fail
>due to transient conditions, returning appropriate notification to
>the se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
Problem what I don`t know were is a bottle neck and I don`t know how to find
it. I turn on mail_debug and all other but it not show anything what I look.
Does these problems occure all the time, e.g. if
Robert Schetterer schrieb:
> Hi Timo,
> with dovecot 1.2
> copy delete etc imap funktions
> get slow down extremly
>
> log shows that the copy command
> is done right but takes extremly log to perform
> sometimes goes into timeout
>
> --log
>
> dovecot: Jan 20 15:48:48 Info: IMAP(hu...@schettere
Hi Timo,
with dovecot 1.2
copy delete etc imap funktions
get slow down extremly
log shows that the copy command
is done right but takes extremly log to perform
sometimes goes into timeout
--log
dovecot: Jan 20 15:48:48 Info: IMAP(hu...@schetterer.com): copy: uid=5,
box=Drafts, dest=Trash,
msgid=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
Just as a side note (since Charles made his point very clear - to which
I completely agree BTW):
RFC 2821 is obsoleted by RFC 5321.
RFC5321 sec 4.2.4
the same wording about:
o if attempts to deli
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 09:53 +0100, Tom Sommer wrote:
sql(u...@example.com,127.0.0.1): query: SELECT username as user,
plainpassword as password, nopassword FROM cyrususers WHERE username =
'u...@example.com' AND password = PASSWORD('SECRET') AND active = 1
dovecot: Jan 2
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 09:53 +0100, Tom Sommer wrote:
> sql(u...@example.com,127.0.0.1): query: SELECT username as user,
> plainpassword as password, nopassword FROM cyrususers WHERE username =
> 'u...@example.com' AND password = PASSWORD('SECRET') AND active = 1
> dovecot: Jan 20 09:01:18 Info: a
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 07:21 +0100, Wilhelm Meier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag 19 Januar 2009 schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 18:32 +0100, Wilhelm Meier wrote:
> > > kmail instead seems to have some problems: if I save a mail into
> > > the shared-folder, the other users are seeing t
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 13:53 +0900, Masaharu Kawada wrote:
> -2008/11/16
> The customer updated openldap package
> openldap-2.2.13-6.4E ⇒ openldap-2.2.13-12.el4
..
> For this reason, the customer wants to know why dovecot accessed only
> server2 since ldap package was updated on 2008/11/16 and also
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Jan 20, 2009, at 6:05 AM, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
But dovecot -n don`t show things like a login_max_processes_count and
other thing what I think must be a bootle neck.
It doesn't show it, because you're using the default value for it.
Anyway if you think login process
On Jan 20, 2009, at 2:38 AM, Stefan Jurisch wrote:
Yet I do not know, what functionality the 1.2 provides. In fact I
just need an implementation of the 4 IMAP commands MYRIGHTS, GETACL,
SETACL and DELETEACL and the ability for the user to share mailboxes
himself by using these commands.
..
On Jan 20, 2009, at 5:35 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On 2009-01-20, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
I tried setting mmap_disable=yes today, but got two new failures 2.5
hours later :-(
I check the logs for the last failure, and see that at the
same second two servers were trying to deliver se
Steffen Kaiser:
> RFC2821 sec 2.1
Just as a side note (since Charles made his point very clear - to which
I completely agree BTW):
RFC 2821 is obsoleted by RFC 5321.
Regards
mks
On Jan 20, 2009, at 6:05 AM, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
But dovecot -n don`t show things like a login_max_processes_count
and other thing what I think must be a bootle neck.
It doesn't show it, because you're using the default value for it.
Anyway if you think login processes is the bottleneck
Hi Steffen,
Steffen Kaiser schrieb:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Charles Marcus wrote:
>
>> On 1/18/2009 5:47 PM, Gary V wrote:
>>> The only functional difference I can see (at least as far
>>> as 'over quota' is concerned) is who sends the bounce (and
>>> subsequently - what message the bounce contain
On 1/20/2009 6:10 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
>> Again... the only unit responsible for sending actual bounce messages is
>> the SENDERS MTA. Your (receiving) MTA should only either ACCEPT (if so,
>> NEVER generate a 'bounce' later), DEFER or REJECT.
> That's wrong.
> To "accept" means to take over
On 1/20/2009, Proskurin Kirill (proskurin...@fxclub.org) wrote:
> But dovecot -n don`t show things like a login_max_processes_count and
> other thing what I think must be a bootle neck.
I was aware it left out config info from other external files (like
dovecot-sql configs) - but I thought thiall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Postfix. Will it do it out of the box? No. You can add hooks to Postfix using
the pre-queue content filter, milter, access policy delegation or patches so
So your answer is wrong, Postfix _doesn't_ do it.
On 20.01.2009 12:20 Andrey Urtaykin wrote:
> Nice, but how i can use it in migration ? i mean how to make dovecot
> use passwords in this format ?
> And i just surprised by fact that google says "You`re fist one who want
> to migrate from dbmail to dovecot"
>
>> On 20.01.2009 10:42 Андрей Юртай
Hi All.
Linux have EXT_RQUOTAPROG (Extended (LINUX) RPC quota program). Does
anybody know how to implement dovecot GROUP NFS quota-fs?
=kostik
Nice, but how i can use it in migration ? i mean how to make dovecot
use passwords in this format ?
And i just surprised by fact that google says "You`re fist one who want
to migrate from dbmail to dovecot"
Pascal Volk пишет:
On 20.01.2009 10:42 Андрей Юртайкин wrote:
Hi i want to migrate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 1/18/2009 5:47 PM, Gary V wrote:
The only functional difference I can see (at least as far
as 'over quota' is concerned) is who sends the bounce (and
subsequently - what message the bounce contains). If
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 1/20/2009 4:10 AM, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
We use Dell 2950 with 4GbRAM at FreeBSD-7.0-p9 - load avarage never
upper a 0.5
You don't give dovecot version... don't you think that might be important?
We have about 500 clients most of it use Outlook 2007 via IMAP.
We r
On 20.01.2009 10:42 Андрей Юртайкин wrote:
> Hi i want to migrate from dbmail to dovecot, the main problem is passwords.
> dbmail uses "md5-hash" wich crypt "111" to
> "$1$tZNR7pR4$jMuuKWm7ljRyL8iEMfjep.".
>
> Tried all dovecot pass schemes thru `dovecotpw` and no one matches.
> The main question
On 1/20/2009, Jan-Frode Myklebust (janfr...@tanso.net) wrote:
> % dovecot -n
> # 1.0.15: /usr/local/dovecot-1.0.15/etc/dovecot.conf
Maybe try latest stable version?
--
Best regards,
Charles
On 1/20/2009 4:10 AM, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
> We use Dell 2950 with 4GbRAM at FreeBSD-7.0-p9 - load avarage never
> upper a 0.5
You don't give dovecot version... don't you think that might be important?
> We have about 500 clients most of it use Outlook 2007 via IMAP.
>
> We run in this proble
On 2009-01-20, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
>
> I tried setting mmap_disable=yes today, but got two new failures 2.5
> hours later :-(
I check the logs for the last failure, and see that at the
same second two servers were trying to deliver separate messages
to the same account. I'll try avoiding a
I have just upgraded to 1.1.8, hoping to fix these types of errors:
Jan 20 10:39:27 laura deliver(xxx...@example.net): Broken file
/srv/storage/mail/store/net/example/xx/xx/Maildir/dovecot-uidlist line 156:
Invalid data:
Jan 20 10:41:19 laura dovecot: POP3(yy...@example.at): Broken file
/sr
On 2009-01-13, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
>
> Reading your old mails: are you still using GPFS? This crash just
> shouldn't be happening, so perhaps something randomly breaks with it.
> Are you using mmap_disable=3Dyes? Multiple servers can access the same
> user's mails at the same time?
I tried set
Hi i want to migrate from dbmail to dovecot, the main problem is passwords.
dbmail uses "md5-hash" wich crypt "111" to
"$1$tZNR7pR4$jMuuKWm7ljRyL8iEMfjep.".
Tried all dovecot pass schemes thru `dovecotpw` and no one matches.
The main question is how to migrate dbmail -> dovecot.
Hello all.
We start to use Dovecot at our email production but it runs not such
fast as we expect.
We use Dell 2950 with 4GbRAM at FreeBSD-7.0-p9 - load avarage never
upper a 0.5
We have about 500 clients most of it use Outlook 2007 via IMAP.
We run in this problems:
1) Sync of imap folder
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 16:25 +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
I had to increase the max_mail_processes to 8192
to have a functionnal IMAP server with normal clients AND
squirrelmail clients
8192 sounds enormous to me , any infos welcome !
How many imap processes have you runnin
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 14:33 +0100, Tom Sommer wrote:
Sorry to bump this, but I can still reproduce it - I have enabled
auth_debug now to attempt to provide some more details.
Actually enable auth_debug_passwords=yes. It then also logs what's seen
in the cache entri
El Martes, 20 de Enero de 2009 a las 08:47, geoffroy desvernay escribió:
> Here we use "uris" parameter instead of "hosts", and we seems to have
> expected behaviour: dovecot is always using the first listed uri except
> if it doesn't respond (switch to the second)
Same experience here (RHEL4 and
87 matches
Mail list logo
