> > Upgraded to 1.1.2 from atrpms.net but I'm still
> getting
> > the same behavior. I am trying to look at the quota
> > plugin source (e.g. quota-maildir.c), but I'm very
> rusty
> > in that aspect already. Thank you.
>
> This should help:
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/a80719eac45d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a problem and I have not been able to figure out how to get it to
log any useful information. I would like to see what is happening
between the client and the server. I was thinking that I might use strace.
-Don
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 12:58:35AM +0300, Timo Si
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 12:58:35AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 00:51 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > 2) People who don't even think about looking at logs.
>
> Oh, one more alternative to this I thought of:
I think still 2b is
Hi,
I wrote earlier to mention that I am having touble with LSUB command
reporting "permission denied' on some accounts and not others that are
identical as far as I can see.
I am trying various combinations of stuff, so i set up a new IMAP
account in Thunderbird that went to one of the account
Hi,
I am using dovecot: 1.0.rc15
I was upgrading Debian and installed new versions of lots of things.
My mail came fine and I though there was not problem until a user called
and said it was not working through webmail. I tried, it it worked fine
and I realized the problem was with dovec
Oct 5 22:51:59 ns6 dovecot: POP3(aewhale): file_lock_dotlock() failed
with mbox file /var/spool/mail/aewhale: Permission denied
Any suggestions?
--
Albert E. Whale, CHS CISA CISSP
Sr. Security, Network, Risk Assessment and Systems Consultant
--
Not sure what happened here, but today, all of a sudden, pop3 emails are
not being deleted. I was using the 1.1.3 version then upgraded to 1.1.4
now it no longer deletes emails.
Suggestions?
--
Albert E. Whale, CHS CISA CISSP
Sr. Security, Network, Risk Assessment and Systems Consultant
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Probably one of the most commonly asked question is "Why does Dovecot
> just say authentication failed"? It would be nice to be able to get rid
> of these questions by having Dovecot itself point out the
> http://wiki.dovecot.org/WhyDoesItNotWork link. But how to do this? The
Hi Timo,
i tried a littel bit playing with shared mailboxes
namespace shared {
separator = /
# %%u gets expanded to the remote user. Instead of %%u you can
# also use %%n and %%d.
prefix = "shared/"
location =
maildir:/usr/local/virtual/%d:CONTROL=/usr/local/virtual/%d:INDEX=/usr/local/
>> I've been working around the problem by deleting the contents of
>> ~user/.imap for affected users, but I'd really prefer to fix it
>> properly. :-) Any suggestions would be gratefully received.
>
>I think this should get fixed by itself? Although the first login fails,
>the next one should su
Hi
this conf parameters managesieve
sections seems to be different in 1.2
---
sieve=/usr/local/virtual/%d/%u/.dovecot.sieve
sieve_storage=/usr/local/virtual/dovecot-special/%d/%u/sieve
---
this worked before
but leads to log
Error in configuration file /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf line 809: Unkno
Robert Schetterer schrieb:
> Timo Sirainen schrieb:
>> On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 20:30 +0200, Bernhard Herzog wrote:
>>> On 02.10.2008, Sascha Wilde wrote:
We discovered that this new code in dict-server.c seems to be the problem:
server->fd = net_listen_unix_unlink_stale(path, 64)
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/alpha/dovecot-1.2.alpha2.tar.gz
> http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/alpha/dovecot-1.2.alpha2.tar.gz.sig
>
> Mainly the same fixes as in v1.1.3 -> v1.1.4 plus some more
> v1.2-specific fixes.
>
> Not many people have been testing v1.2 releases
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 00:51 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> 2) People who don't even think about looking at logs.
Oh, one more alternative to this I thought of:
Even though these people don't read logs, they probably restart Dovecot
manually at some point (if they don't give up immediately). Doveco
Probably one of the most commonly asked question is "Why does Dovecot
just say authentication failed"? It would be nice to be able to get rid
of these questions by having Dovecot itself point out the
http://wiki.dovecot.org/WhyDoesItNotWork link. But how to do this? There
are two groups of people h
Thanks, your detailed instructions were EXACTLY what I was looking for, I'll
try them out and report back in a few days with the results.
On 29 Sep 2008 at 8:40, Rainer Frey (Inxmail GmbH) wrote:
> Then you simply configure Dovecot as described in
> http://wiki.dovecot.org/SSL/DovecotConfigurat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Timo Sirainen said the following on 05/10/08 19:40:
> Not many people have been testing v1.2 releases. Wonder if there's
> something I could do to improve that. I guess v1.2 is kind of missing
> those killer features that would get a lot of people to
Timo Sirainen schreef:
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 21:28 +0200, Luuk wrote:
hi,
Could anyone give some info on this plugin?
When i read the wiki (http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Zlib) i'm still
left with some questions...
I use Maildir to store my mails, if i enable this zlib-plugin,
should i
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 21:28 +0200, Luuk wrote:
> hi,
>
> Could anyone give some info on this plugin?
> When i read the wiki (http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Zlib) i'm still
> left with some questions...
>
> I use Maildir to store my mails, if i enable this zlib-plugin,
> should i 'manually' comp
hi,
Could anyone give some info on this plugin?
When i read the wiki (http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Zlib) i'm still
left with some questions...
I use Maildir to store my mails, if i enable this zlib-plugin,
should i 'manually' compress all messages?
or wil the uncompressed messages still be
On Sunday 05 October 2008 21.07.40 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 20:44 +0200, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> > istream-raw-mbox.c:86: error: `EBADMSG' undeclared (first use in
> > this function)
>
> Hmh. EBADMSG is supposed to be part of POSIX.1. Why doesn't OpenBSD
> have that?
>
> Well, in
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 20:40 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Not many people have been testing v1.2 releases. Wonder if there's
> something I could do to improve that. I guess v1.2 is kind of missing
> those killer features that would get a lot of people to try it. :)
Hi Timo,
I've been running 1.2a
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 19:54 +0100, Andre Lopes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'am using Ubuntu Server, and I can't get Dovecot working. Please give me a
> clue if you can.
>
> Ok, my gide to configuration was https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Dovecot
>
> I tryed to "telnet mydomain.com 110", but the authenti
Andre Lopes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'am using Ubuntu Server, and I can't get Dovecot working. Please give me a
> clue if you can.
>
> Ok, my gide to configuration was https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Dovecot
>
> I tryed to "telnet mydomain.com 110", but the authentication fails, give
> this error:
>
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 20:44 +0200, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> istream-raw-mbox.c:86: error: `EBADMSG' undeclared (first use in this
> function)
Hmh. EBADMSG is supposed to be part of POSIX.1. Why doesn't OpenBSD have
that?
Well, in any case you could replace the EBADMSG with something else. I
guess I
Hi,
I'am using Ubuntu Server, and I can't get Dovecot working. Please give me a
clue if you can.
Ok, my gide to configuration was https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Dovecot
I tryed to "telnet mydomain.com 110", but the authentication fails, give
this error:
-ERR Authentication failed.
Besides
On Sunday 05 October 2008 19.14.30 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.4.tar.gz
Compiling on OpenBSD 4.3, gives this error:
Making all in mbox
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../.. -I../../../../src/lib
-I../../../../src/lib-mail -I../../../../src/lib-imap
-I..
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Diego Liziero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 15:27 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 22:35 +0200, Diego Liziero wrote:
>>> > I got it with multiple ima
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/alpha/dovecot-1.2.alpha2.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/alpha/dovecot-1.2.alpha2.tar.gz.sig
Mainly the same fixes as in v1.1.3 -> v1.1.4 plus some more
v1.2-specific fixes.
Not many people have been testing v1.2 releases. Wonder if there's
something I could
On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 19:31:20 +0300
Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You probably also moved userdb static before userdb passwd, causing
> Dovecot to always use userdb static for everyone. So the order you want
> is:
>
> 1. passdb passwd-file
> 2. passdb pam
> 3. userdb passwd
> 4. userd
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.4.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.4.tar.gz.sig
- SORT: Yet another assert-crashfix when renumbering index sort IDs.
- ACL plugin fixes: Negative rights were actually treated as positive
rights. 'k' right didn'
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 17:39 +0100, Andre Lopes wrote:
> Then I try to auth by telnet with:
>
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> +OK
> pass mypass
> -ERR Authentication failed.
>
> I know that my password it's ok.
http://wiki.dovecot.org/WhyDoesItNotWork -> password mismatch
signature.asc
Description:
Hi,
I'am new to Dovecot and Postfix...
I have made a Postfix installation as "Internet with Smarthost".
I'am using a domain in Godaddy, I have point "A (Host) Record" to my IP and
the "MX Record" is also pointing to my IP. I have tested sending e-mail from
my gmail.com account to my server, the
* Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 08:03 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > #7 0x080d94fe in file_wait_lock (fd=-1,
> > path=0x97d1e38 "/home/m/r/mrowka/Maildir/dovecot.index.search",
> > lock_type=1, lock_method=FILE_LOCK_METHOD_FCNTL, timeout_secs=60,
> >
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 15:27 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 22:35 +0200, Diego Liziero wrote:
>> > I got it with multiple imaptest instances even with current dovecot-1.1 hg
>> > tree.
>> >
>> > I check
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 13:27 -0300, Dâniel Fraga wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 18:59:10 +0300
> Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If you don't set auth_debug=yes (and auth_verbose=yes? I'm not sure),
> > you won't see any error messages when real users log in.
>
> Would you belie
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 18:47 -0700, Patrick Medina wrote:
> --- On Mon, 9/1/08, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: [Dovecot] GETQUOTAROOT (part 2)
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
> > Date: Monday, September 1
On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 18:59:10 +0300
Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you don't set auth_debug=yes (and auth_verbose=yes? I'm not sure),
> you won't see any error messages when real users log in.
Would you believe that when I switch the order of the
real/virtual users authentic
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 12:52 -0300, Dâniel Fraga wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 14:26:26 +0300
> Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You can't really tell that to Dovecot, but you could move passdb
> > passwd-file {} before passdb pam {} so it'll first check the virtual
> > users and you'l
On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 14:26:26 +0300
Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can't really tell that to Dovecot, but you could move passdb
> passwd-file {} before passdb pam {} so it'll first check the virtual
> users and you'll avoid the PAM messages.
Ok, I would see less error messa
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 17:23 +0200, Diego Liziero wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 17:00 +0200, Diego Liziero wrote:
> >> >
> >> > file index-mail.c: line 1091 (index_mail_close): assertion failed:
> >> > (!mail->data.destroy
On 10/5/2008, Timo Sirainen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Is it still configurable, and the change you referenced above is the new
>> default?
> Yes.
Nice... :)
>> Also, instead of 'user', how about $user (local part of users email
>> address)?
> Too much trouble. :) And I'm not sure if it he
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 11:28 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 10/5/2008, Timo Sirainen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I changed it now to:
> >
> > "Quota exceeded (mailbox for user is full)"
> >
> > Although I'm wondering if that should have been "for the user"..
> >
> > Also to my surprise I no
On 10/5/2008, Timo Sirainen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I changed it now to:
>
> "Quota exceeded (mailbox for user is full)"
>
> Although I'm wondering if that should have been "for the user"..
>
> Also to my surprise I noticed that the text has been configurable in all
> v1.1 versions. You cou
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 17:55 +0300, arvids wrote:
> On Sunday 05 October 2008 17:15:45 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > That's the point of using prefetch userdb. Either don't use it, or copy
> > all the quota_* fields to password_query as well (with userdb_ prefix).
>
> Thank you very much for pointing it
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 17:00 +0200, Diego Liziero wrote:
>> >
>> > file index-mail.c: line 1091 (index_mail_close): assertion failed:
>> > (!mail->data.destroying_stream)
>
> Hmm. So that assert could be because Dovecot ran o
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 17:00 +0200, Diego Liziero wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Diego Liziero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Not sure if it's related, but the only assertion that is failing now
> > is this one (sorry, this time I've no core file):
> >
> > file index-mail.c: line 1091
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Diego Liziero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Not sure if it's related, but the only assertion that is failing now
> is this one (sorry, this time I've no core file):
>
> file index-mail.c: line 1091 (index_mail_close): assertion failed:
> (!mail->data.destroyi
> ng_s
On Sunday 05 October 2008 17:15:45 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> That's the point of using prefetch userdb. Either don't use it, or copy
> all the quota_* fields to password_query as well (with userdb_ prefix).
Thank you very much for pointing it out, I forgot about this prefetch thing.
Now imap quota is
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 22:01 +0200, Diego Liziero wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Could you do:
> > >
> > >> #6 0x080fcb64 in i_stream_read_data (stream=0x9
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 17:02 +0300, arvids wrote:
> For some reason the user_query is not executed, only password_query.
That's the point of using prefetch userdb. Either don't use it, or copy
all the quota_* fields to password_query as well (with userdb_ prefix).
signature.asc
Description: Thi
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 18:45 +0200, e-frog wrote:
> So it seems to use the home directory from the user executing the
> expire-tool.
This should help: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.1/rev/e6cd18cbd698
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sunday 05 October 2008 16:47:26 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> It doesn't show anything about quota rules, so the quota_rule isn't
> being specified correctly by your userdb. Show your dovecot-sql.conf,
> enable auth_debug=yes and show what the logs say when logging in.
the log says:
Oct 5 16:55:44 ho
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 16:42 +0300, arvids wrote:
> On Sunday 05 October 2008 15:15:49 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > You should have only one quota_rule that's
> > '*:storage=500:messages=5'
> >
> > I'm not sure what it does with your configuration. I suppose it's also
> > possible that it works
On Sunday 05 October 2008 15:15:49 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> You should have only one quota_rule that's
> '*:storage=500:messages=5'
>
> I'm not sure what it does with your configuration. I suppose it's also
> possible that it works as intended..
>
> Anyway, set mail_debug=yes and show what th
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 15:27 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 22:35 +0200, Diego Liziero wrote:
> > I got it with multiple imaptest instances even with current dovecot-1.1 hg
> > tree.
> >
> > I checked the emails with that UIDs and they are actually truncated.
> >
> > Some thi
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 20:30 +0200, Bernhard Herzog wrote:
>> On 02.10.2008, Sascha Wilde wrote:
>>> We discovered that this new code in dict-server.c seems to be the problem:
>>>
>>> server->fd = net_listen_unix_unlink_stale(path, 64);
>>> if (server->fd == -1)
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 08:03 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> #7 0x080d94fe in file_wait_lock (fd=-1,
> path=0x97d1e38 "/home/m/r/mrowka/Maildir/dovecot.index.search",
> lock_type=1, lock_method=FILE_LOCK_METHOD_FCNTL, timeout_secs=60,
> lock_r=0x97db704) at file-lock.c:129
> r
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 15:25 -0700, Jon Callas wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> When I switch from one network to another, I sometimes get dovecot
> rejecting my connections.
>
> The error I get in the log is similar to:
>
>Sep 22 15:23:22 hostname dovecot: imap-
Did downgrading help? I've still no ideas why it would have been doing
that with v1.1..
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 08:24 +0100, Yates Ian Mr (ITCS) wrote:
> I'm confused by this as well.
>
> Additionally with 1.1.3 we were getting lots of reports of people
> deleting/moving items from their inbox and
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 19:08 +1200, Reinhard Sanjeet Lal wrote:
> dovecot: Sep 24 18:51:49 Info: pop3-login: Aborted login (auth failed, 1
> attempts): user=, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, secured
This says the authentication failed. Setting auth_debug=yes will make it
log more and sh
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 16:16 +0200, Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x00628b1a in strcmp () from /lib/libc.so.6
> #1 0x08048f8b in setfolder_seenfile (_sf=0xb7f4e008, _mailbox=0x997dcc3
> "mkretchn",
> _uidvalidity=1204103732) at c2c.c:936
I released 1.6.ts version that fixes this cr
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 22:35 +0200, Diego Liziero wrote:
> I got it with multiple imaptest instances even with current dovecot-1.1 hg
> tree.
>
> I checked the emails with that UIDs and they are actually truncated.
>
> Some things I noted on these mails:
> - they are all with MIME multipart attac
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 09:46 -0400, Ron Wilhoite wrote:
> "Mailbox for $user is full - quota exceeded" or
>
> "Mail storage for $user is full - quota exceeded"
I changed it now to:
"Quota exceeded (mailbox for user is full)"
Although I'm wondering if that should have been "for the user"..
Also
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 11:43 +0300, arvids wrote:
> Hello,
>
> imap-quota plugin always returns empty quota:
> a1 GETQUOTA ""
> * QUOTA "" ()
> a1 OK Getquota completed.
> a2 GETQUOTAROOT INBOX
> * QUOTAROOT "INBOX"
> a2 OK Getquotaroot completed.
>
> quota_rule
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 16:32 +0200, Joseba Torre wrote:
> El Sábado, 22 de Septiembre de 2007 a las 16:40, Timo Sirainen escribió:
> > Right. The symlink isn't the problem, the problem is that it's on a
> > different filesystem so rename() fails. There are two ways to handle
> > this:
> >
> > 1) Cop
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 02:08 -0400, Steven Winikoff wrote:
>Sep 30 00:09:56 alcor dovecot: pop3[5006] , NNN.NNN.NN.NNN: Corrupted
> transaction log file /home//.imap/INBOX/dovecot.index.log: record size
> too small (type=0x40, offset=12224, size=0)
..
> I've been working around the pro
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 03:22 -0300, Dâniel Fraga wrote:
> This messages happen because dovecot is trying to check virtual
> users in the system password file (which just contains real users and
> not virtual users).
>
> So is there a way to force it to check virtual users just on
> the
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 09:19 +0200, Oli Schacher wrote:
> > Oct 1 10:52:15 inet2 dovecot: dict: Unknown dict module: mysql
> > Oct 1 10:52:15 inet2 dovecot: dict: Failed to initialize dictionary
> > 'quotadict'
>
> Problem seems to be related to dovecot 1.1.3 .
> 1.1.2 works fine with the same co
On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 21:15 -0400, Karsten Künne wrote:
> we recently upgraded dovecot from 1.0.5 to 1.1.3+latest patches. After the
> upgrade I saw some errors in the logs and I'm not sure whether they're a
> cause for concern. Our setup is 2 servers running openSUSE 11.0 and a NetApp
> Filer a
Thanks - someone else recommended that and it worked.
X
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 12:28 -0400, Xev Gittler wrote:
I've recently installed dovecot, and while the behavior on folders is
correct, the inbox cannot be expunged.
..
mail_location: mbox:~/Mail:INBOX=/var/
On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 12:05 +0400, Anton Zakatov wrote:
> Names of groups should be stored in backend memory pool.
Thanks, committed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/c283babd0ab1
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 12:28 -0400, Xev Gittler wrote:
> I've recently installed dovecot, and while the behavior on folders is
> correct, the inbox cannot be expunged.
..
> mail_location: mbox:~/Mail:INBOX=/var/spool/mail/%u
It probably doesn't have permissions to create dotlock
to /var/spool/mail
On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 20:30 +0200, Bernhard Herzog wrote:
> On 02.10.2008, Sascha Wilde wrote:
> > We discovered that this new code in dict-server.c seems to be the problem:
> >
> > server->fd = net_listen_unix_unlink_stale(path, 64);
> > if (server->fd == -1) {
> > if (er
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 14:33 -0400, Stewart Dean wrote:
> I am seeing posix_fallocate and file_set_size errmsgs in the mail syslog, but
> see a pattern:
>
> 1) They only happen with the /var/spool/mail inbox NOT with any of the /home
> folders and appear to be happening every 10 minutes from the ti
75 matches
Mail list logo
