On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 17:06 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> The RFC for this apparently is 2060, but:
You should be looking at 3501 :)
> > 2.3.3. Internal Date Message Attribute
> It sounds like this INTERNALDATE changes... I'd like something that is
> from the message headers - ie, that doesn'
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 15:49 +0200, Tom Sommer wrote:
> On Tue, August 19, 2008 15:44, Tom Sommer wrote:
>
> > Using version 1.1.1, MySQL userdb, with "nopassword=Y".
> >
> > Maybe it's due to nopassword?
>
> Should add, this is my password_query:
>
> password_query = SELECT username as user, NUL
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 07:35 +0200, Roberto Tagliaferri - Tosnet srl
wrote:
> Hi, i've upgraded from 1.0.5 to 1.1.2 on 2 server and work fine for user
> that grab email on client, but some customer (that leave the email on
> server) have 2 problems.
>
> Some client can't read new mail:
> dovecot:
At 18:17 20-08-2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a prviooous thread you suggested that we use
define(`confDONT_PROBE_INTERFACES',`True')dnl. When that line didn't
produce any positive results we removed it. Just before generating
this reply we ran a few more test after removing the only entry
"
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 11:15 +0200, Jiri Novosad wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I tried this on Gentoo with dovecot-antispam version 20080601 and
> dovecot versions 1.0.15-r1, 1.1.0, 1.1.1 and 1.1.2.
> Versions 1.1.0+ all fail.
> Version 1.0.15-r1 works fine, even if I add the "Next message
> unexpectedly
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 14:31 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I can select SPAM and NOT_Spam, delete messages etc, but when I select
> "Shared", it shows: "Mailbox doesn't exist: Shared." As a client I used OE
> and Thunderbird. How to get rid of that message?
"Shared" is a namespace prefix, not a
Oh, one more reply:
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 14:32 -0700, Jonathan Herbach wrote:
> > if (mbox->mbox_lock_type == F_RDLCK) {
> > /* FIXME: we shouldn't fail here. it's just
> > a locking issue that should be possible to
> > fix.. */
> > mail_storage_set_error(storage,
> > MAIL_ERROR_NOTPOSSIBLE,
> >
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 18:43 -0700, Jonathan Herbach wrote:
> I really miss the ability to reorder messages in my inbox since I often use
> it as a queue of important items. Does anybody have any ideas why I'm seeing
> this error message? Or better yet, how to potentially (re) configure the
> sys
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 09:52 +0200, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
> - this is not specific to INBOX: when saving a message from a folder to
> the same folder, Alpine complaints with the message
> [Can't copy mails inside same folder ]
Why do you want to do it? I disabled it because it caused Dovecot
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 22:43 +0400, Mail.ru wrote:
> > dovecot works fine with AD! but i have this in logs (This not nice,
> > but no more):
> > Aug 14 02:21:03 somecomp dovecot: auth(default): LDAP: Connection
> > lost to LDAP server, reconnecting
> > Aug 14 02:21:03 somecomp dovecot: auth(default)
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 17:33 +0100, John Hannfield wrote:
> I am using the latest dovecot 1.1.2 with postfix, and using doveco
> deliver command for LDA.
> I really love dovecot, and how it has progressed over the years.
> However I have noticed that
> if I put a TAB character in the dovecot.conf
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 03:22:34PM -0700, SM wrote:
> At 14:45 20-08-2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >WORKSTATION# echo '$=w' | /usr/sbin/sendmail -bt
>
> [snip]
>
> >guice.ath.cx
>
> Your domain is listed as local. It should not be there if you are
> using the /etc/mail/sendmail.cf file you
Hello,
I am using the latest dovecot 1.1.2 with postfix, and using doveco
deliver command for LDA.
I really love dovecot, and how it has progressed over the years.
However I have noticed that
if I put a TAB character in the dovecot.conf file, it sometimes does
not parse the file correctlty,
and
At 14:45 20-08-2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WORKSTATION# echo '$=w' | /usr/sbin/sendmail -bt
[snip]
guice.ath.cx
Your domain is listed as local. It should not be there if you are
using the /etc/mail/sendmail.cf file you generated. grep that file
for DontProbeInterfaces.
Regards,
-sm
--On Wednesday, August 20, 2008 7:35 AM -0400 Blake Carver
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I guess I'm not quite sure how to interpret this to help me figure out
my problem, there are changes rpm reports, does this mean that an RPM
was installed but so was a source package?
rpm -V -v dovecot
..
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 02:33:13PM -0700, SM wrote:
> At 11:26 20-08-2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Well you can see 'Mailer(local)' is still in the loop (above)
>
> That's the problem. What's the output of:
>
> echo '$=w' | /usr/sbin/sendmail -bt
>
> Regards,
> -sm
>
WORKSTATION# echo '$
--On Wednesday, August 20, 2008 11:23 AM -0400 Charles Marcus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why anyone would knowingly run ancient versions of critical apps is
beyond me.
Stability. It's not uncommon for apps to be interdependent. Upgrading one
can have unexpected consequences in another app.
At 11:26 20-08-2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well you can see 'Mailer(local)' is still in the loop (above)
That's the problem. What's the output of:
echo '$=w' | /usr/sbin/sendmail -bt
Regards,
-sm
> I suppose the OP does not sort by date but Arrival time (this means arrival
> time in the mailbox).
Exactly. I sort by arrival time, which in practice is the "unsorted" ordering
based upon the mbox file itself. (Except I'd like to control the arbitrary
"unsorted" order that I want by "resave
Hey mouss,
Still waiting on your comments on the new vacation.pl for postfixadmin -
had a chance to take a look yet?
On 8/20/2008, mouss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> So, where does this 'Order Received' column in TBird get its info from?
>> I'm guessing it is a TBird thing, like an internal inde
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 08:45:54AM -0700, SM wrote:
> At 05:48 20-08-2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >You are correct. Allow me to provide just a little more detail.
> >We're assuming that dovecot.confs' 'Mail_location:' has nothing to do
> >with the MTA handing off to the 'deliver' LDA. With th
> dovecot works fine with AD! but i have this in logs (This not nice,
> but no more):
> Aug 14 02:21:03 somecomp dovecot: auth(default): LDAP: Connection
> lost to LDAP server, reconnecting
> Aug 14 02:21:03 somecomp dovecot: auth(default):
> kevent(EV_DELETE, 9) failed: Bad file descriptor
> Aug
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 8/20/2008, Nicolas KOWALSKI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The alpine documentation states about 'Arrival' sorting:
" The Arrival sort option arranges messages in the MESSAGE INDEX in
the order that they exist in the folder. This is usually the same as
the order in which
Blake Carver wrote:
Thanks Rod,
So I guess my big question here is, how do I upgrade this sucker?
I'd love to just use an RPM, but if this was originally installed via
source will I mess it up?
When I do rpm -qa | grep dovecot I get dovecot-1.0-1.2.rc15.el5
BUT
dovecot --version shows me a diffe
At 05:48 20-08-2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are correct. Allow me to provide just a little more detail.
We're assuming that dovecot.confs' 'Mail_location:' has nothing to do
with the MTA handing off to the 'deliver' LDA. With that being said, no
matter what the dovecot.confs' 'mail_locati
On 8/20/2008 11:35 AM, Stewart Dean wrote:
> Because it isn't busted?
Just because you don't *think* its busted doesn't mean its not...
Of course, I'm not saying that running an up to date version completely
solves this question - *all* s/w has bugs, its just a matter of when
they are discovered
Because it isn't busted?
Charles Marcus wrote:
Why anyone would knowingly run ancient versions of critical apps is
beyond me.
--
Stewart Dean, Unix System Admin, Henderson Computer Resources
Center of Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, New York 12504
[EMAIL PROTECTED] voice: 845-758-7
On 8/20/2008, Roderick A. Anderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> To get the latest and greatest you'll have to either build your own
> RPM or do a tarball install.
Or just use atrpms.net...
Why anyone would knowingly run ancient versions of critical apps is
beyond me.
--
Best regards,
Charles
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Vytenis Sabaliauskas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Our company has decided to make a fake POP3 (and possibly IMAP) server,
> which accepts any user name and password combination and shows there are no
> new messages. This is for the purpose t
Blake Carver wrote:
Thanks Rod,
So I guess my big question here is, how do I upgrade this sucker?
I'd love to just use an RPM, but if this was originally installed via
source will I mess it up?
When I do rpm -qa | grep dovecot I get dovecot-1.0-1.2.rc15.el5
I think the default for RHEL 5. Cent
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:10:54PM -0700, SM wrote:
> At 15:22 19-08-2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Re: [Dovecot] TECRA-A9 -- devcot LDA/sendmai
> >
> >The mail is not delivered to the ~/Maildir; mail continues to get
> >delivered to /var/mail/.
> >
> >First thing first, if you're reading this s
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 08:43:02AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> In my mind, there should be two primary date/time columns:
>
> Sent Date/Time = Date/time of the Client system when message was sent
> (this is already there as the plain 'Date' column)
>
> and
>
> Received Date/Time = Date/time t
On 8/20/2008, Nicolas KOWALSKI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The alpine documentation states about 'Arrival' sorting:
>
> " The Arrival sort option arranges messages in the MESSAGE INDEX in
> the order that they exist in the folder. This is usually the same as
> the order in which they arrived. Thi
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 07:25:38AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 8/20/2008, Nicolas KOWALSKI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I suppose the OP does not sort by date but Arrival time (this means
> > arrival time in the mailbox).
>
> It was my understanding that arrival time is the time the messa
Thanks Kenneth
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:02 PM, Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The best you can do here is to query the database to see if the
> files it knows about match those on the disk. For that, use "rpm -V -v
> dovecot". That does a verbose verify and tells you what files it kn
Thanks Rod,
So I guess my big question here is, how do I upgrade this sucker?
I'd love to just use an RPM, but if this was originally installed via
source will I mess it up?
When I do rpm -qa | grep dovecot I get dovecot-1.0-1.2.rc15.el5
BUT
dovecot --version shows me a different #
On Tue, Aug 19
On 8/20/2008, Nicolas KOWALSKI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I suppose the OP does not sort by date but Arrival time (this means
> arrival time in the mailbox).
It was my understanding that arrival time is the time the message was
DELIVERED (by whatever mechanism is in place for final delivery of
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 07:00:22AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 8/20/2008, Nicolas KOWALSKI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > - this is not specific to INBOX: when saving a message from a folder to
> > the same folder, Alpine complaints with the message
> > [Can't copy mails inside same fold
Sorry, my previous post looked like sh.. (due to html I guess)
I'm trying to create Shared folder with subfolders "SPAM" and "NOT_Spam".
Configuration:
namespace public {
separator = /
prefix = Shared/
location = maildir:/vmail/%Ld/Shared:INDEX=/vmail/%Ld/%Ln/Shared
hidden = no
}
Result I get (i
On 8/20/2008, Nicolas KOWALSKI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> - this is not specific to INBOX: when saving a message from a folder to
> the same folder, Alpine complaints with the message
> [Can't copy mails inside same folder ]
I'm not sure what you mean by 'saving' a message in the same folde
Jiri Novosad wrote:
Mikael Jenkler wrote:
I have some issues to with dovecot 1.1.x, it seams buggish
do you also have this issue?
There is a issue with dovecot-antispam and the new dovecot-1.1.x
(dovecot-1.1.1)
The imap server d
Mikael Jenkler wrote:
I have some issues to with dovecot 1.1.x, it seams buggish
do you also have this issue?
There is a issue with dovecot-antispam and the new dovecot-1.1.x
(dovecot-1.1.1)
The imap server dies when sending mail
I have some issues to with dovecot 1.1.x, it seams buggish
do you also have this issue?
There is a issue with dovecot-antispam and the new dovecot-1.1.x
(dovecot-1.1.1)
The imap server dies when sending mail, the mail goes away but
Michael Carter wrote:
Coincidentally, we have just began work on a JavaScript IMAP client. With
it, building a webmail app should be *entirely* a UI concern. The good news
is that our Socket interface is very stable and is being used in production
for protocols like IRC for webchat. The bad news
Hi again,
I tried this on Gentoo with dovecot-antispam version 20080601 and
dovecot versions 1.0.15-r1, 1.1.0, 1.1.1 and 1.1.2.
Versions 1.1.0+ all fail.
Version 1.0.15-r1 works fine, even if I add the "Next message
unexpectedly lost" check (see below).
So it seems to be a bug in dovecot (? but
Hi, I'm trying to create Shared folder with subfolders "SPAM" and
"NOT_Spam". Configuration: namespace public { separator = / prefix
= Shared/ location =
maildir:/vmail/%Ld/Shared:INDEX=/vmail/%Ld/%Ln/Shared hidden = no }
Result I get (is exactly what I want): Inbox Drafts Sent Trash Shared
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 09:09:57AM +0200, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 08:34:03AM +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Jonathan Herbach wrote:
> >
> >> I've noticed a change since Dovecot was upgraded. I used to reorder
> >> items within my INBOX in al/pine by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
I notice the same thing than Jonathan, when using mbox format. No
problem with maildir format.
I use Maildir, too.
Bye,
- --
Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/L
Roberto Tagliaferri - Tosnet srl ha scritto:
Hi, i've upgraded from 1.0.5 to 1.1.2 on 2 server and work fine for
user that grab email on client, but some customer (that leave the
email on server) have 2 problems.
[...]
Update: i've downgraded to 1.0.9 and work fine (1.0.15 has the same
problem
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 08:34:03AM +0200, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Jonathan Herbach wrote:
>
>> I've noticed a change since Dovecot was upgraded. I used to reorder
>> items within my INBOX in al/pine by "saving" messages back to the
>> INBOX, which I was connecting via IMAP
>
50 matches
Mail list logo
