> I suppose the OP does not sort by date but Arrival time (this means arrival
> time in the mailbox).
Exactly. I sort by arrival time, which in practice is the "unsorted" ordering
based upon the mbox file itself. (Except I'd like to control the arbitrary
"unsorted" order that I want by "resave to inbox" to handle reordering.)
Nicolas wrote:
> - a quick grep shows this is 'normal' behaviour, as written in
> src/lib-storage/index/mbox/mbox-save.c
>
> if (mbox->mbox_lock_type == F_RDLCK) {
> /* FIXME: we shouldn't fail here. it's just
> a locking issue that should be possible to
> fix.. */
> mail_storage_set_error(storage,
> MAIL_ERROR_NOTPOSSIBLE,
> "Can't copy mails inside same mailbox");
> return -1;
> }
So I'm currently using: mbox_write_locks: fcntl
When I was using version 9 the relevant config setting was: "mbox_locks =
fcntl", which plus the config suggestion "fcntl: Use this if possible" led me
down this path.
Does anybody know why this code was designed this way / why it is different
from 0.99 behavior / etc?
Jonathan
_________________________________________________________________
Get thousands of games on your PC, your mobile phone, and the web with Windows®.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/108588800/direct/01/
