> > Jun 26 00:02:34 userimap13.xs4all.nl dovecot: IMAP(xxx):
> > file_dotlock_create(/var/spool/mail/dovecot-control/g/gl/xxx/INBOX/.Apple
> > Mail To Do/dovecot-uidlist) failed: Permission denied
> >
> > userimap1# ls -al "/var/spool/mail/dovecot-control/g/gl/xxx/INBOX/.Apple
> > Mail To Do" t
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 23:44 +0100, Nuno Lopes wrote:
> I think that the question wasn't to the point. The problem we have is in
> the transition phase. At one point we have emails with the header and
> emails that haven't got it but we don't want users to notice the
> introduction of this plugi
Hi Hugo,
I'll have a look into that one. For some strange reason I hadn't seen
things that way.
Thanks both to you and Johannes,
--
Nuno Lopes
Hugo Monteiro wrote:
I recently installed an IMAP server with dovecot and the dovecot
antispam plugin with dspam backend.
If I configure dspam to no
>
>>> I recently installed an IMAP server with dovecot and the dovecot
>>> antispam plugin with dspam backend.
>>>
>>> If I configure dspam to not include the signature in the
>>> X-DSPAM-Signature header will I be able to move mail into SPAM folder?
>>>
>>
>> Not with the dspam backend.
>>
>> joha
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Did you create dovecot-shared file to the maildir as
http://wiki.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes specifies?
But one strange thing remains: I can tag messages (lime "Important",
"Work", "Personal" and so on in Thunderbird) and tags are preserved at
Thunderbird restart, but a
I recently installed an IMAP server with dovecot and the dovecot
antispam plugin with dspam backend.
If I configure dspam to not include the signature in the
X-DSPAM-Signature header will I be able to move mail into SPAM folder?
Not with the dspam backend.
johannes
I think that the q
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.2.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.2.tar.gz.sig
Development of new features in this release and the upcoming
multi-master replication are sponsored by Directi (www.directi.com).
Lucene indexing is currently deprecated in favor of the
Timo Sirainen wrote:
make clean shouldn't ever be necessary, since automake does dependency
tracking..
I thought so too, but it was fine on SuSE when I did a "make clean".
Anyway, it didn't make any difference on Solaris 8 :(
I can try this in Solaris 10, but I don't really see why the
OS
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 02:51 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > >>> dovecot: Jul 24 00:22:22 Error: IMAP 13458 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx :
> > >>> Cached message offset 75979 is invalid for mbox file (read-only mbox
> > >>> stream)
> > >
> > > I'm not able to reproduce this at least on Linux..
> > >
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 00:47 +0100, Chris Wakelin wrote:
>
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 00:34 +0100, Chris Wakelin wrote:
> >> Well, now it doesn't assert crash, but (on the Solaris 8 machine):
> >>
> >>> dovecot: Jul 24 00:22:22 Error: IMAP 13458 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx :
> >
Timo, thank you!
I did not created these files. I'm sorry for asking here, I have spent at least
couple hours but did not see the thing.
Now everything working great!
--
Sergey.
- "Timo Sirainen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 18:57 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 00:34 +0100, Chris Wakelin wrote:
Well, now it doesn't assert crash, but (on the Solaris 8 machine):
dovecot: Jul 24 00:22:22 Error: IMAP 13458 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx : Cached
message offset 75979 is invalid for mbox file (read-only mbox stream)
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 12:01 -0400, Jason Frisvold wrote:
> I'm working on converting my server from using bincimap to dovecot. I
> seem to be having some trouble with folders, however. Binc was set up
> like this :
>
> depot = "IMAPdir", /* Use Maildir++ style
..
>
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 00:34 +0100, Chris Wakelin wrote:
> Well, now it doesn't assert crash, but (on the Solaris 8 machine):
>
> > dovecot: Jul 24 00:22:22 Error: IMAP 13458 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx :
> > Cached message offset 75979 is invalid for mbox file (read-only mbox stream)
I'm not able t
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 17:33 +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Monday 21 July 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 15:51 +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > > On Monday 21 July 2008, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > > > + Maildir: Add ,S= to maildir filename whenever quota
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 01:11 +0200, Christer Mjellem Strand wrote:
> Jul 21 14:27:41 betty dovecot: IMAP(foobar): Maildir
> /var/vpopmail/domains/foobar.baz/foobar/Maildir sync: UID inserted in the
> middle of mailbox (4412 > 4385, file = 1214817167.16333_0.betty:2,RST)
Show your dovecot -n outpu
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 15:58 +0100, Chris Wakelin wrote:
I've tried this on both Solaris 8 and SuSE Enterprise 9 (64-bit).
I get a assert-crash when using a gzipped mbox folder
..
istream-raw-mbox.c: line 363 (i_stream_create_raw_mbox): assertion
failed: (input->v_offset
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 02:04 +0200, Andreas Podgurski wrote:
> dovecot: Jul 22 01:48:13 Info: auth(default-listen):
> auth(Andreas.Podgurski_at_MediaGUILD.de): username changed
> Andreas.Podgurski_at_MediaGUILD.de -> SunAdmin
deliver ignores this username change. It probably shouldn't, but I'm
n
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 11:24 +0200, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
> have you read this thread on vpopmail?
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot@dovecot.org/msg11289.html
This talks about vchkpw instead of the direct vpopmail library support.
Which one do you want to use?
Anyway implemented this for ch
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 10:58 -0300, M. Rodrigo Monteiro wrote:
> Hello!
>
> This might be an easy question, but here it goes: how can I know the
> quota of an determined user?
> I'm trying to use maildir quota...
Log in as the user (http://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/MasterUsers
may help) and
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 15:58 +0100, Chris Wakelin wrote:
> I've tried this on both Solaris 8 and SuSE Enterprise 9 (64-bit).
>
> I get a assert-crash when using a gzipped mbox folder
..
> istream-raw-mbox.c: line 363 (i_stream_create_raw_mbox): assertion
> failed: (input->v_offset == 0)
Fixed: ht
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 20:19 +0200, Heiko Schlichting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> $ dovecot --build-options
> Build options: ioloop=epoll notify=inotify
> Mail storages: maildir
> SQL drivers:
> Passdb: checkpassword
> Userdb: checkpassword prefetch
>
> Isn't "checkpassword" misplaced
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 10:52 -0600, Mark Leisher wrote:
> Given the (slightly edited) config info below, iPod Touch users are
> unable to connect, leaving the following message in the log file:
>
> dovecot: Jul 23 10:00:40 Info: imap-login: Disconnected (auth failed, 0
> attempts): rip=1.2.3.4, l
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 18:57 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a problem, delivery called from /etc/aliases file by pipe delivers
> with mode 0600.
> I need system users with shared mail folders (Maildir format).
> When I changed alias to pipe to shell wrapper with mode 002 set in it
Hi,
I have a problem, delivery called from /etc/aliases file by pipe delivers with
mode 0600.
I need system users with shared mail folders (Maildir format).
When I changed alias to pipe to shell wrapper with mode 002 set in it, nothing
changed.
MTA is sendmail, OS Solaris, and dovecot version 1
Jack Stewart wrote on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:29:06 -0700:
> We you run 'netstat -tan' (or equivalent), what state are the packets
> in? If it is just a bunch of processes with no active connections then
> it should not be a big deal.
Well, the point is they should not have been there ;-) The proce
> and I notice that dovecot doesn't handle the brute-force attacks too nice.
> I reduced the limit a bit to some reasonable looking value:
> login_max_processes_count = 32
> to stop them earlier and the number of processes stops at that figure when
> an attack happens.
Somewhat off original topic.
Bill Landry wrote on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:18:44 -0700:
> Kai, you can test your regex using "fail2ban-regex".
Thanks for the answer. Yeah, I found that in the meantime. Great little
helper. For some reason I cannot get any rule that ends in $ to work, so
I've now come up with
failregex = dovec
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:05:13 +0200 Edgar Fuß wrote:
> > Why this? I do this with iptables.
> Hm. Mainly because I find hosts.{allow,deny} easier to handle in this case
> than (i)pf.conf. It's also somewhat more staightforward to maintain a single
> pair of hosts.* files consistent accross all mai
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Charles Marcus wrote on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:30:30 -0400:
The best answer is to use a tool made for this kind of job, like fail2ban.
I found a few fail2ban definitions on the web, but all seem to be either
very outdated or plain wrong for RHEL/CentOS. I've come so far as t
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 17:54 +0100, Isabel Estêvão wrote:
> Hi
>
> Which dovecot-antispam backend (must allow the movement of mail into
> SPAM folder) integrates with amavis and spamassassin?
You should probably use the 'mailtrain' plugin since it just calls an
external program, which would usuall
Hi,
$ dovecot --build-options
Build options: ioloop=epoll notify=inotify
Mail storages: maildir
SQL drivers:
Passdb: checkpassword
Userdb: checkpassword prefetch
Isn't "checkpassword" misplaced in the userdb list?
For me it seems that USERDB_CHECKPASSWORD is only used in
Hello,
If I use dovecot as LDA how do I move old mails without signature?
Regards,
Isabel
Michael A. Revenko wrote:
> Hello, isabel.estevao!
> You wrote to on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:26:54 +0100:
>
> ie> I recently installed an IMAP server with dovecot and the dovecot
> ie> antispam plugin with
Let's see what the wiser people have to say:
http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/2008-July/000917.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
> Any idea how other servers do this?
Cyrus at least give
* LIST (\Noinferiors) "/" "INBOX"
but also uses \HasNoChildren for all other folders with read permission
only. I noticed the difference between Cyrus and dovecot for INBOX.
> I don't think \Noinferiors would be
> correct, because:
Hi,
We you run 'netstat -tan' (or equivalent), what state are the packets
in? If it is just a bunch of processes with no active connections then
it should not be a big deal.
We've seen something on our SMTP servers that sounds similar (our IMAP
servers haven't been hit yet). The problem is
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 12:07 -0400, Daniel Brosseau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am new to the dovecot source and would like to know why the
> mailbox_module_context has a pointer to the mail_storage_module_register and
> not to a mailbox_module_register.
Hmm. I don't actually remember anymore all that mu
> Why this? I do this with iptables.
Hm. Mainly because I find hosts.{allow,deny} easier to handle in this case than
(i)pf.conf. It's also somewhat more staightforward to maintain a single pair of
hosts.* files consistent accross all mail servers than to deal with individual
packet filter rules.
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 18:47 +0200, Heiko Schlichting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> using ACL plugin with dovecot 1.1.1 I expected that a Maildir was listed as
>
> * LIST (\NoInferiors) "/" "Foldername"
>
> if "create" (k) permission is not set in ACLs and there doesn't exists any
> subfolders. But to my
Given the (slightly edited) config info below, iPod Touch users are
unable to connect, leaving the following message in the log file:
dovecot: Jul 23 10:00:40 Info: imap-login: Disconnected (auth failed, 0
attempts): rip=1.2.3.4, lip=5.6.7.8, TLS handshaking: Disconnected
Even with maximum lo
Hi
Which dovecot-antispam backend (must allow the movement of mail into
SPAM folder) integrates with amavis and spamassassin?
Regards,
Isabel
Hi,
using ACL plugin with dovecot 1.1.1 I expected that a Maildir was listed as
* LIST (\NoInferiors) "/" "Foldername"
if "create" (k) permission is not set in ACLs and there doesn't exists any
subfolders. But to my surprise, dovecot gives the following output:
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "
> I recently installed an IMAP server with dovecot and the dovecot
> antispam plugin with dspam backend.
>
> If I configure dspam to not include the signature in the
> X-DSPAM-Signature header will I be able to move mail into SPAM folder?
Not with the dspam backend.
johannes
signature.asc
Des
Hi,
I recently installed an IMAP server with dovecot and the dovecot
antispam plugin with dspam backend.
If I configure dspam to not include the signature in the
X-DSPAM-Signature header will I be able to move mail into SPAM folder?
Regards,
Isabel
Hi,
I am new to the dovecot source and would like to know why the
mailbox_module_context has a pointer to the mail_storage_module_register and
not to a mailbox_module_register. From what I have understood, if a context
is first added to the mailbox.module_contexts array using the
mail_storage_modu
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 11:42 -0400, John Wells wrote:
> Thanks Timo...from what I know of Solr, it can handle it. But I'm
> curious how the integration works...specifically:
>
> - When are messages added to Solr? Is it only when new ones arrive, or
> can older messages be injected as well?
Current
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 12:55 -0400, John Wells wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 12:37 -0400, John Wells wrote:
>> >> Guys,
>> >>
>> >> We have a
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 00:29:48 Scott Murman wrote:
> i run my server (web, email, calendar, etc.) off a mac mini ppc.
> it's a beautiful thing for our modest needs (quiet, low power,
> stable), but i'm looking at switching it to a vanilla bsd. has
> anyone tried dovecot on an openbsd (or sim
Charles Marcus wrote on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:30:30 -0400:
> The best answer is to use a tool made for this kind of job, like fail2ban.
I found a few fail2ban definitions on the web, but all seem to be either
very outdated or plain wrong for RHEL/CentOS. I've come so far as to this
with the regex
On 7/23/2008, Kai Schaetzl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I had this mailing list searched for "brute-force" to see how others
handle this and what dovecot provides to stop these attacks.
The best answer is to use a tool made for this kind of job, like fail2ban.
But as to why the processes remain
Kenneth Porter wrote:
I just installed the Rawhide package on my CentOS 5 system. The one
item that bit me is that the config file defaults to using interface
"[::]" so it only listens on IPv6. (This is from a patch in the
package that changes the upstream default of "*", so it only affects
those
Hello!
This might be an easy question, but here it goes: how can I know the
quota of an determined user?
I'm trying to use maildir quota...
Regards,
Rodrigo.
--
M. Rodrigo Monteiro
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Free as in Freedom, not free as in free beer"
Linux User # 403730
> I'll ask the question on tech-kern.
It looks like there is no method of explicitly syncing a drectory; you'll have
to sync the individual files instead.
The reason is probably that before the advent of soft updates, metadata write
on FFS used to be syncronous anyway.
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:31:20 +0200 Edgar Fuß wrote:
> I'd like to see tcp-wrappers.patch getting integrated into dovecot.
> I ported the original 1.0 patch to 1.1, but would prefer not to have to
> maintain another local patch.
>
> As the name suggests, the patch adds libwrap support to dovecot.
I'd like to see tcp-wrappers.patch getting integrated into dovecot.
I ported the original 1.0 patch to 1.1, but would prefer not to have to
maintain another local patch.
As the name suggests, the patch adds libwrap support to dovecot. We use is to
limit access from outside our network to secure
I'm in the process of rolling out new setups with dovecot on CentOS 5.2
and I notice that dovecot doesn't handle the brute-force attacks too nice.
I reduced the limit a bit to some reasonable looking value:
login_max_processes_count = 32
to stop them earlier and the number of processes stops at th
56 matches
Mail list logo
