On Jun 13, 2008, at 5:44 PM, Dan Roberts wrote:
mail_location: mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u
Like others said, mbox is your problem. For migrating to maildir, see
for example http://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration/MailFormat. Don't bother
trying the convert plugin though, it's broken in 1.0.rc
Scott Silva wrote:
on 6-13-2008 10:24 AM Dan Roberts spake the following:
The intent on my part was not to be trapped, but to simplify life.
I don't work at a command line or system level on a regular enough
basis these days to be 100% confident that I won't screw it up, so
relying on a syst
On 6/13/2008, Dan Roberts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Using Yum (or whatever it is called) I thought things were up to
date. Though I use to hack code and fearlessly write perl, my
skills are rusty and I don't want to blow a whole in the system.
As I said... add atrpms.net to your available re
on 6-13-2008 10:24 AM Dan Roberts spake the following:
The intent on my part was not to be trapped, but to simplify life. I
don't work at a command line or system level on a regular enough basis
these days to be 100% confident that I won't screw it up, so relying on
a system that is pseudo ca
Charles Marcus píše v Pá 13. 06. 2008 v 13:16 -0400:
> On 6/13/2008, Dan Horák ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > When CentOS 5.2 is released (I hope it is only very few weeks away), you
> > will get 1.0.7, the same as is in RHEL 5.2.
>
> I would *never* use any OS/distro that dictated what version o
The intent on my part was not to be trapped, but to simplify life. I
don't work at a command line or system level on a regular enough basis
these days to be 100% confident that I won't screw it up, so relying
on a system that is pseudo capable of keeping itself together was a
saccrifice I
On 6/13/2008, Dan Horák ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
When CentOS 5.2 is released (I hope it is only very few weeks away), you
will get 1.0.7, the same as is in RHEL 5.2.
I would *never* use any OS/distro that dictated what version of what s/w
I could run.
In this case, all you need to do is lo
Charles Marcus píše v Pá 13. 06. 2008 v 11:50 -0400:
> On 6/13/2008, Dan Roberts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > ./dovecote --version returns "1.0.rc15"
>
> Upgrade... then we'll talk...
>
> rc15 is just too old and buggy...
>
When CentOS 5.2 is released (I hope it is only very few weeks away),
On 6/13/2008, Dan Roberts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
./dovecote --version returns "1.0.rc15"
Upgrade... then we'll talk...
rc15 is just too old and buggy...
--
Best regards,
Charles
At 5:08 AM +0300 6/13/08, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 19:28 -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
At 1:17 AM +0300 6/13/08, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 11:10 -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
[...]
>> However, I DO clobber the dovecot-uidlist in .Trash as part of my
>> monthly hou
Hi,
I am migrating from 0.99.14 to 1.1.rc10 and from mbox to maildir.
During the conversion, via convert plugin, I get this assertion failure:
2008-06-13 14:12:51 Error: IMAP(username): Next message unexpectedly lost from
4700
2008-06-13 14:12:51 Error: IMAP(username): Next message unexpectedly
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 17:09 +0300, Uldis Pakuls wrote:
> Same situation with dovecot - I tired to delete ~ 120 000 messages form
> "catch-all-possible-spam" mailbox using Thunderbird. Filter out
> messages older than 7 days was successfully. Thunderbird failed to
> delete them (locked up)... i go
Hi -
Last year I set up a new CentOS 5 server and through the install
process permitted it to set up dovecot as my IMAP server.
./dovecote --version returns "1.0.rc15"
With the system up and running I moved the tar files of my old email
accounts over and everything seemed to be just fine.
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 01:57 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> There's no Dovecot v1.0 used anywhere? How did you get these
> dovecot-uidlist files created? Did you use a Courier migration script
> or
> rename them manually?
I used courier migration script.
>
> These error messages can happen only
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 15:08 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Well, I have a brain-dead user (using Thunderbird 2.0.0.14) who just
>> won't listen when I tell them not to try to move 5000+ messages at one
>> time (or if deleting, bypass the Trash), and they
On Jun 13, 2008, at 7:02 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
Just for info - release 1.1.rc10 builds successfully on Fedora Rawhide
on all 4 architectures.
Also compiles successfully on OS X 10.4.11 using...
./configure --with-ssldir=/System/Library/OpenSSL --with-ssl=openssl
--with-notify=kqueue
...as
Hello,
i'm using in my installation qmail+vpopmail and now I have migrated from
courier-imap to dovecot.
Dovecot is very much faster with large mailbox than courier-imap.
But I have a problem.
vpopmail has a feature that allows you to "Disable non webmail IMAP access",
many webmail using imap
Just for info - release 1.1.rc10 builds successfully on Fedora Rawhide
on all 4 architectures.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=660479
Dan
--
Fedora and Red Hat package maintainer
I succeeded in installing rc10 under HP-UX PA-RISC machine with gcc
(hp-gcc64-4.2.1). It created .sl suffixed libraries.
Also, I succeeded in making rc10 under HP-UX Itanium machine with the following
configuration:
$ ./configure CC=/opt/aCC/bin/aCC -AC99
It created .so suffixed libraries.
H
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 11:04 +0200, Bruno Prémont wrote:
> > The attached patch makes dovecot send the whole answer in a single
> > packet, thus not triggering the delay issue.
>
> Although the patch works for this APPEND case, it proba
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 10:58 +0200, Martijn de Munnik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using dovecot for the first time on a production server (before
> dovecot I used bincimapd). I have a question about the number of imap
> (not imap-login) processes created for a user. I've seen 100+
> processes for ju
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 11:04 +0200, Bruno Prémont wrote:
> The attached patch makes dovecot send the whole answer in a single
> packet, thus not triggering the delay issue.
Although the patch works for this APPEND case, it probably adds delays
when other commands are pipelined, because tagged repli
Dovecot version: 1.1-rc8, 1.1-rc9
System: Linux-2.6.2x
User-Agent: claws-mail-3.3 and 3.4
When appending messages (e.g. copy from mailclient local folder or
second server to dovecot imap folder) dovecot answers with:
OK [APPENDUID ] Append completed\r\n
This answer often reaches the client as t
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 02:09 -0700, Woonsan Ko wrote:
> By the way, on the [1] machine, I succeeded in `make' by using gcc like the
> following:
> $ ./configure CC=/opt/hp-gcc64-4.2.1/bin/gcc
>
> > [1] `uname': HP-UX B.11.23 U
> > `model': 9000/800/rp3440
> > CPU: PA-RISC
> > `aCC --ve
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc10.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc10.tar.gz.sig
v1.1.0 will be released on next Friday if nothing horrible happens.
* LIST X-STATUS renamed to LIST STATUS and fixed its behavior with
LIST-EXTENDED options.
By the way, on the [1] machine, I succeeded in `make' by using gcc like the
following:
$ ./configure CC=/opt/hp-gcc64-4.2.1/bin/gcc
> [1] `uname': HP-UX B.11.23 U
> `model': 9000/800/rp3440
> CPU: PA-RISC
> `aCC --version': HP ANSI C++ B3910B A.03.80
The plugins are created with .sl
Hi,
I'm using dovecot for the first time on a production server (before
dovecot I used bincimapd). I have a question about the number of imap
(not imap-login) processes created for a user. I've seen 100+
processes for just 1 user. So far it only occurs for 1 user, other
users have just 1
Actually I'm testing with two HP-UX machine here.
[1] `uname': HP-UX B.11.23 U
`model': 9000/800/rp3440
CPU: PA-RISC
`aCC --version': HP ANSI C++ B3910B A.03.80
[2] `uname': HP-UX B.11.23 U ia64
`model': ia64 hp server rx5670
CPU: Itanium
`aCC --version': HP aC++/ANSI C B391
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 00:55 -0700, Woonsan Ko wrote:
> It is like the following in the generated Makefile:
>
> MODULE_SUFFIX = .so
Are the plugins created using .so or .sl suffix?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
It is like the following in the generated Makefile:
MODULE_SUFFIX = .so
--- On Fri, 6/13/08, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] configure error on HP-UX: C99 compatible vsnprintf()
> call
> To: "Dovecot Mailing List"
>
Hi Timo,
Please see comments below.
--- On Fri, 6/13/08, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] configure error on HP-UX: C99 compatible vsnprintf()
> call
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: "Dovecot Mailing List"
> Date: Friday,
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 09:40 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 23:37 -0700, Woonsan Ko wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I tried to build dovecot-1.1.rc9 on a HP-UX machine, but failed to
> > configure with the following message:
> >
> > configure: error: You don't appear to have C99 c
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 00:12 -0700, Woonsan Ko wrote:
> Hi Timo,
>
> Thank you very much for quick response.
> I have just tested with your new package, but they print other errors during
> `make':
>
> 1. `make' after `configure'
>
> Error 239: "str-find.c", line 17 # A struct/union shall not co
Hi Timo,
Thank you very much for quick response.
I have just tested with your new package, but they print other errors during
`make':
1. `make' after `configure'
Error 239: "str-find.c", line 17 # A struct/union shall not contain a member
with incomplete type.
int goodtab[];
34 matches
Mail list logo
