Actually I'm testing with two HP-UX machine here.
[1] `uname': HP-UX B.11.23 U
`model': 9000/800/rp3440
CPU: PA-RISC
`aCC --version': HP ANSI C++ B3910B A.03.80
[2] `uname': HP-UX B.11.23 U ia64
`model': ia64 hp server rx5670
CPU: Itanium
`aCC --version': HP aC++/ANSI C B3910B A.05.55 [Dec 04 2003]
With [1], the MODULE_SUFFIX is ".sl", and plugins are created with .sl suffix
when I compile dovecot-1.0.13.
But, With [2], the MODULE_SUFFIX is ".so", and plugins are created with .so
suffix when I compile dovecot-1.0.13.
I have no idea why there's a difference between the two.
I googled a page
(http://osdir.com/ml/gnu.libtool.general/2003-10/msg00019.html) which seems
saying 11.x can make .so suffixed ELF shared library.
I don't know. Is it from the difference between PA-RISC and Itanium or from the
difference of the compiler versions?
--- On Fri, 6/13/08, Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] configure error on HP-UX: C99 compatible vsnprintf()
> call
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: "Dovecot Mailing List" <dovecot@dovecot.org>
> Date: Friday, June 13, 2008, 5:00 PM
> On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 00:55 -0700, Woonsan Ko wrote:
> > It is like the following in the generated Makefile:
> >
> > MODULE_SUFFIX = .so
>
> Are the plugins created using .so or .sl suffix?
