On Friday 30 May 2008 02:34:56 Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Geert Hendrickx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:16:55PM -0400, webbie wrote:
> > > I got a compile error with rc6, rc5 works fine.
> >
> > Exactly the same on NetBSD:
> >
> >
> > m
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Geert Hendrickx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:16:55PM -0400, webbie wrote:
> > I got a compile error with rc6, rc5 works fine.
>
>
> Exactly the same on NetBSD:
>
>
> mail-index-write.c: In function `mail_index_write':
> mail-index-write.c
On 2008. May 30. 08:12:39 Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:16:55PM -0400, webbie wrote:
> > I got a compile error with rc6, rc5 works fine.
>
> Exactly the same on NetBSD:
>
>
> mail-index-write.c: In function `mail_index_write':
> mail-index-write.c:179: error: structure has no
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:16:55PM -0400, webbie wrote:
> I got a compile error with rc6, rc5 works fine.
Exactly the same on NetBSD:
mail-index-write.c: In function `mail_index_write':
mail-index-write.c:179: error: structure has no member named `st_ctim'
mail-index-write.c:179: error: structu
I got a compile error with rc6, rc5 works fine.
amd64:dovecot-1.1.rc6# uname -a
FreeBSD amd64.objtech.com 7.0-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p1 #3: Fri
Apr 18 02:18:13 EDT 2008
./configure \
--prefix=/opt1/dovecot \
--localstatedir=/var \
--without-shadow \
--without-cyrus-sasl2 \
--without-p
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On May 30, 2008, at 5:48 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
Is there a feature list somewhere that shows what's new in 1.1
compared to 1.0 ?
See v1.1.rc1 in NEWS file (or http://dovecot.org/doc/NEWS-1.1). I'll
probably move that to top of the file again when releasing v1.1.0.
On May 30, 2008, at 5:48 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
Is there a feature list somewhere that shows what's new in 1.1
compared to 1.0 ?
See v1.1.rc1 in NEWS file (or http://dovecot.org/doc/NEWS-1.1). I'll
probably move that to top of the file again when releasing v1.1.0.
PGP.sig
Description: T
Is there a feature list somewhere that shows what's new in 1.1 compared
to 1.0 ?
Thanks - that fixed it. It appears to be working but I'm scream testing
it. If my phone starts ringing then it's broken. :)
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On May 30, 2008, at 5:15 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
I had just tested rc5 today and it didn't work for me. So I just
downloaded rc6 and same problem. He
On May 30, 2008, at 5:15 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
I had just tested rc5 today and it didn't work for me. So I just
downloaded rc6 and same problem. Here's what I'm seeing in the log.
dovecot: May 29 19:10:10 Error: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
mail_location: maildir: Unknown setting:
dovecot: May
Hi Timo,
I had just tested rc5 today and it didn't work for me. So I just
downloaded rc6 and same problem. Here's what I'm seeing in the log.
dovecot: May 29 19:10:10 Error: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
mail_location: maildir: Unknown setting:
dovecot: May 29 19:10:10 Fatal: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc6.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc6.tar.gz.sig
This is it. The first v1.1 release that actually deserves the "release
candidate" name. It contains everything I require from v1.1.0 release.
There are two bugs left that I'd lik
Scott Silva wrote:
You need to clear that checkbox with mbox storage for sure. It might be
OK if you are using Maildir.
It works perfectly fine with Maildir.
On 5/29/2008 5:47 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
OK - about to jump to the new version of dovecot. Is there anything I
need to change in the config files or things I should know? I'm using
maildir format running under Fedora 8.
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Upgrading/1.1
--
Best regards,
Charles
OK - about to jump to the new version of dovecot. Is there anything I
need to change in the config files or things I should know? I'm using
maildir format running under Fedora 8.
* Timo Sirainen :
> On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 16:16 +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> > What I see is that the client seems to try to retrieve the same mails
> > (retr=5/448621) over and over again.
> >
> > If they login using IMAP they don't experience any problems.
> >
> > Any idea what this coul
Diego Liziero píše v Čt 29. 05. 2008 v 19:49 +0200:
> On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 16:48 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am the new maintainer of dovecot for Fedora and Red Hat and so I am
> > trying to cleanup some old reported bugs.
> > [..]
>
> Mmm.. I was wondering if it's worth to have
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 16:48 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am the new maintainer of dovecot for Fedora and Red Hat and so I am
> trying to cleanup some old reported bugs.
> [..]
Mmm.. I was wondering if it's worth to have a look at the various
dovecot patches used by main distributions bef
Thank you Tomasz!
The quota per user worked fine now...
The problem was that in dovecot.conf I had these lines:
userdb static {
args = uid=5000 gid=5000 home=/home/vmail/%d/%n allow_all_users=yes
}
And I just changed to:
userdb sql {
args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf
}
Now it's workin
on 5-28-2008 9:37 PM Knute Johnson spake the following:
Knute Johnson wrote:
I think I solved both questions. With Thunderbird one needs to uncheck
the "Server supports folders that contain sub-folders and messages" from
the Advanced Account Settings dialog. And I guess that answers my
ques
No idea how to add the -g3 option to compile. Once done, how and where
is the gdb generated? I would need detailed help to do this.
I know that it is known to not work, but if nobody uses it, then it
will never work.
I think this plugin is great, a great way to classify SPAM without
difficult ins
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 14:24 +0200, Vegard Svanberg wrote:
> What is this error message actually trying to tell me?
>
> May 28 13:47:24 yyy dovecot: POP3([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Disconnected: Storage
> error
> during logout. top=0/0, retr=2/73195, del=0/435, size=13509375
This is not really an error
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 15:40 -0700, David Jonas wrote:
> I spoke too soon. Dovecot still complains about the invalid character.
> While testing I had forgotten to update to remove from
> username_chars. I should have known really, since the invalid chars
> check is done before var_expand() in au
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 16:48 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am the new maintainer of dovecot for Fedora and Red Hat and so I am
> trying to cleanup some old reported bugs. One of them is a problem when
> "deliver" writes of temporary files into /tmp are blocked by SELinux
> policy (https://
Hello,
I am the new maintainer of dovecot for Fedora and Red Hat and so I am
trying to cleanup some old reported bugs. One of them is a problem when
"deliver" writes of temporary files into /tmp are blocked by SELinux
policy (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424091). From the
SELinux's
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 16:16 +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> What I see is that the client seems to try to retrieve the same mails
> (retr=5/448621) over and over again.
>
> If they login using IMAP they don't experience any problems.
>
> Any idea what this could be?
> Rumor has it it's a know
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 10:21 +0200, Claude Frantz wrote:
> The strange behaviour seems to be probably related to Thunderbird. When
> opening the connection to the public shared folder, Thunderbird shows
> the number of ALL messages in the folder, in the window in which one the
> folders related t
A Client runs a RAS network. Users access mailboxes using Outlook Express.
The server runs dovecot-1.0.3-13_60.
Almost a week ago users began to report that they can't retrieve their mail.
The session starts, they seem to retrieve messages, but then the client
reports a problem and the session is
Timo Sirainen wrote:
The problem, while using Thunderbird: The "read only" user can delete
messages or mark then read. But after a new session, all the messages
are still "new". Of course, only "baratin" is the owner.
So you'd want all users to be able to have their own private flags?
The
Anders wrote:
> Well, I got another report about a 1970 timestamp :-(.
>
> Now I have enabled rawlog for all users that are still on Procmail
> delivery. Will this be useful? Is there something else that I can do?
Hi. I now caught this issue once with rawlog. I hope Squirrelmail does not
mangle i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Ulrich Schreiner wrote:
everything works fine except the vacation's from sieve. don't get me wrong,
sieve works for everything, including mailforwards, or sorting in subfolders.
If Sieve's redirect is working, but vacation is
31 matches
Mail list logo
