Hello,
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 19:06:05 + (GMT) John fistack
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Do you think Dovecot could handle millions of active users in a big
> architecture ?
>
Sure, but the architecture will play a bigger role than just
Dovecot.
> This cluster could be for example (each serv
Hi,
I don't know how to compile Dovecot from src rpm;s - in fact I tried and
failed miserably. The only other src rpm I have ever built was postfix, and
I ran into a whole bunch of errors trying to build an rpm from the src rpm
at ATRpm.
Anywho, I was wondering if one of you wonderful Dovecot me
On 3.8.2007, at 2.19, Big Pizzle wrote:
MD5 mis-match, calculated:a628289996ce19910ebbd4eef2ebc3fc, expected
9406a7cf56afb5a1308eb5377e141719!
Probably 0.99.x bug. If it happens with v1.0.x also, please let me know.
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Alexander Hoogerhuis wrote:
> I've just ported a largeish procmail script across to sieve and want to
> get to use wildcards in filing mail and can't seem to get regex to work.
>
> The script starts nicely with:
>
>> require ["fileinto","regex","envelope","vacation","regex"];
>
> and a bit down
Le 02.08.2007 19:53, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
> On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 19:47 +0200, Nicolas STRANSKY wrote:
>> Le 02.08.2007 18:06, Mike Brudenell a écrit :
>>
>>> Nicolas Stransky: Have you actually got it running yet, or just compiled?
>>> If running, did you have to do anything t
On 8/2/07, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Big Pizzle spake the following on 8/2/2007 4:19 PM:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm almost finished building our new load balanced email server that are
> > attached to an NFS mountpoint. There are currently two e-mail servers
> > connected to the NFS
I've just ported a largeish procmail script across to sieve and want to
get to use wildcards in filing mail and can't seem to get regex to work.
The script starts nicely with:
> require ["fileinto","regex","envelope","vacation","regex"];
and a bit down these few lines comes into play:
> elsif h
Big Pizzle spake the following on 8/2/2007 4:19 PM:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm almost finished building our new load balanced email server that are
> attached to an NFS mountpoint. There are currently two e-mail servers
> connected to the NFS share. Both email servers are running CentOS 4.5 with
> Postfi
Hi all,
I'm almost finished building our new load balanced email server that are
attached to an NFS mountpoint. There are currently two e-mail servers
connected to the NFS share. Both email servers are running CentOS 4.5 with
Postfix 2.4.3, Dovecot 0.99, and authenticating via LDAP.
Dovecot is
On Aug 1, 2007, at 12:10 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 12:05 -0700, Jeff Ramsey wrote:
Aug 1 11:58:51 imap dovecot: auth(default): passwd(QUINAULT-
ileneyoung,:::10.200.254.110): lookup
Aug 1 11:58:51 imap dovecot: auth(default): passwd(QUINAULT-
ileneyoung,:::10.200.
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 19:06 +, John fistack wrote:
> For millions of user it could be multiple different clusters of 40 Dovecot
> servers with 1 Netapp for each cluster.
> I want to work in NFS.
You'll want to read at least http://wiki.dovecot.org/NFS. Dovecot v1.1
makes problems with attribu
Hello,
Do you think Dovecot could handle millions of active users in a big
architecture ?
This cluster could be for example (each server is a bi quad Xeon 2.66 Ghz) :
- 40 Dovecot servers
- 4 LVS
- 20 Apache+PHP
- 2 Openldap
- 20 Postfix + ClamAV + SpamAssassin
- 1 NFS Netapps
For millions of
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 19:47 +0200, Nicolas STRANSKY wrote:
> Le 02.08.2007 18:06, Mike Brudenell a écrit :
>
> > Nicolas Stransky: Have you actually got it running yet, or just compiled?
> > If running, did you have to do anything to overcome this
> > missing sy
Le 02.08.2007 18:06, Mike Brudenell a écrit :
> Nicolas Stransky: Have you actually got it running yet, or just compiled?
> If running, did you have to do anything to overcome this
> missing symbol?
Dovecot has compiled well and is running well. I don't get a m
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 17:34 +0100, Mike Brudenell wrote:
> I've just tried #including the rquota_cdr.c file produced by running
> rpcgen on the rquota.x file (as in the code I sent out a few days ago).
>
> That compiled and runs OK, and successfully returns a storage when
> queries with the GE
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 01:04 +0800, Tan Shao Yi wrote:
> Hi Timo,
>
> I just tried your patch in hg and realised it also requires the
> "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit" to be present.
>
> I'm seeing some really bad mailers at my site that provide just header
> Content-Type: text/html; "charset=
Hi Timo,
I just tried your patch in hg and realised it also requires the
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit" to be present.
I'm seeing some really bad mailers at my site that provide just header
Content-Type: text/html; "charset=iso-8859-1" :(
Is there a possibility for us to accommodate such
Sorry for the flurry of messages! ...
On 2 Aug 2007, at 17:06, Mike Brudenell wrote:
However there doesn't seem to be anything in the existing 1.0.3
source or the three patches that provides this function.
Is there something missing from the patches at
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/diff/
On 2 Aug 2007, at 16:56, Mike Brudenell wrote:
What am I missing?
(The especially annoying thing is that xdr_getquota_args is used in
the test program included in the source code I sent out a few days
ago and that worked... but I can't spot what is different in the
linking/runtime.)
Ah!
AAARRGGH!!
On 2 Aug 2007, at 16:19, Nicolas STRANSKY wrote:
This applied and compiled well with v1.0.3.
The patches applied (with fuzz and offsets) to 1.0.3 and compiled OK
under Solaris 10 with Sun's C compiler.
However when I try and start Dovecot I get:
Edlopen(/usr/local/dovecot-1.0.
I don't regard myself as much of an expert, but this is NOT a Dovecot
question, rather one relating to sendmail or your O/S native
authentication functionality. Speaking for myself, I run NIS/yp on my
mailserver and then restrict login...this supplies authentication to all
users receiving mail
Steffen Brunk spake the following on 8/2/2007 7:00 AM:
> Hello list,
>
> my name is Steven and of course: I got a problem...
> we are using dovecot 0.99 because it´s the actual stable version for
> RedHat 4 Enterprise.
> I am trying to authenticate using "PLAIN" but I don´t know how.
> that´s what
Le 02.08.2007 16:12, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
> For v1.1, probably applies to v1.0 code pretty easily too:
>
> http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/rev/078d9dde99c8
>
> The other rquota patches had authunix_create_default() call. Is this
> needed/useful?
>
> The client is now always created+destroyed fo
Joseph Silverman spake the following on 8/1/2007 5:24 PM:
> Apologies for resending this, I am not sure it made it through the first
> time..
> ---
>
> Included below are my config files: sendmail.mc, dovecot.m4,
> dovecot.conf, dovecot-sql.conf. Whenever I try to send email into this
> system, i
Hi Timo,
Thanks so much.
UW-IMAPD includes an additional check for the Content-Transfer-Encoding
too. Would it be a good idea to include it too?
From rfc822.c in UW-IMAPD:
if (!strcmp (tmp+8,"TRANSFER-ENCODING") ||
(!strcmp (tmp+8,"TYPE") && strchr (d,'/'))) {
MM_LOG ("Warning: MI
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 16:00 +0200, Steffen Brunk wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> my name is Steven and of course: I got a problem...
> we are using dovecot 0.99 because it´s the actual stable version for
> RedHat 4 Enterprise.
You will save yourself a lot of trouble in the long run if you build a
packa
Hello list,
my name is Steven and of course: I got a problem...
we are using dovecot 0.99 because it´s the actual stable version for
RedHat 4 Enterprise.
I am trying to authenticate using "PLAIN" but I don´t know how.
that´s what I am doing:
telnet conny.MYDOMAIN.de 143
Trying IP.AD.RE.SS...
C
Hi,
I'm trying to set up two shared folder hierarchies on my Dovecot
installation for two groups of employees, all of whom should only have
access to their own hierarchy. Any employee should be able to create
sub-folders and generally have full access to the hierarchy.
My initial setup was t
For v1.1, probably applies to v1.0 code pretty easily too:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/rev/078d9dde99c8
The other rquota patches had authunix_create_default() call. Is this
needed/useful?
The client is now always created+destroyed for each quota lookup. I'd
think it would be faster if it was c
On 02/08/07, Geert Hendrickx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:33:01PM +0200, jalal wrote:
> > if i want to change the dovecot-sieve file to modify the rules (or even
> > let my users do it at some point) then it has to been done by root.
> >
> > Is there a way to setup the
Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 2 Aug 2007 15:18:
> something saner, and yours is misconfigured to qualify localhost to your
> pinky hostname even on incoming mail. He shows up as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> for me.
Thanks for this explanation. So I believe I should check my mailserver.
Regard
On 8/2/07, Frank Behrens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 2 Aug 2007 11:40:
> >
> > any one have debian etch package for this ? :)
>
> Who are you? You are not somebody @pinky.frank-behrens.de, because that's me.
It's someone who sent a message without a full return addre
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 15:09 +0200, Frank Behrens wrote:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 2 Aug 2007 11:40:
> >
> > any one have debian etch package for this ? :)
>
> Who are you? You are not somebody @pinky.frank-behrens.de, because that's me.
> Your email shows:
Heh. Looks like his MTA is misconf
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 2 Aug 2007 11:40:
>
> any one have debian etch package for this ? :)
Who are you? You are not somebody @pinky.frank-behrens.de, because that's me.
Your email shows:
> Received: from sagat.suryasoft.net (unknown [202.148.14.20])
> by dovecot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
Charles has kindly pointed me to the migration section of the wiki,
apologies for not looking there first.
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 11:02:16AM +0100, Pete McEvoy wrote:
> Hi.
> I've been migrating users from mbox to maildir on a new server running
> dovecot 1.0 - is there any method I can employ t
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 08:36 +0800, Tan Shao Yi wrote:
> Will it be possible to make this available in the 1.0 branch? UW-IMAP
> seems to continue to process e-mails without the MIME-Version, so long as
> it has the Content-Type or -Encoding header.
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.0/rev/5c29a60f0
On Jul 28, 2007, at 3:47 PM, Sergey A. Kobzar wrote:
BTW /home/mail/public/ is not a mailbox and must not contain cur new
and tmp folders. As Timo said this bug was fixed in 1.1.
Just for the record, and I realize it's not scheduled to be fixed
until v1.1, this is still "broken" in v 1.0.
Hi.
I've been migrating users from mbox to maildir on a new server running
dovecot 1.0 - is there any method I can employ to prevent my pop3 users
having to redownload mails after I move them?
Thanks
--
Pete
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Ntaflos schreef:
I got this working just fine, using the method you described below. Of course
I had to base64-encode the "username\0username\0password" string first, which
is probably not so obvious to someone who doesn't have much experience
debugging authentication probl
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:33:01PM +0200, jalal wrote:
> if i want to change the dovecot-sieve file to modify the rules (or even
> let my users do it at some point) then it has to been done by root.
>
> Is there a way to setup the sieve plugin so a user can create his own
> rules? sort of like ~/
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 10:17:32PM +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 03:02:38PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > sievec and sieved binaries are built only if you use 2) method, because
> > they need to link with Dovecot's libraries. They can be used to compile and
> > decompile
any one have debian etch package for this ? :)
On 8/1/2007, "Timo Sirainen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.3.tar.gz
>http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.3.tar.gz.sig
>
> - deliver: v1.0.2's bounce fix caused message to be always saved to
>
42 matches
Mail list logo
