On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 11:08 +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:37:05 +0300 Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hmm. Does this help: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.0/rev/50c79521e8f5
> >
> We have a winner!
> Auth process grows to the same size as with a local DB
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:37:05 +0300 Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hmm. Does this help: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.0/rev/50c79521e8f5
>
We have a winner!
Auth process grows to the same size as with a local DB and stays there.
Now I just have to get this into a security maintaine
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 12:24 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 15.5.2007, at 5.16, John Robinson wrote:
>
> >> One possibility would be to set "uid_file=/vmail/%d gid_file=/
> >> vmail/%d".
> >> I guess that would be good. Added to TODO, but I'm not sure when I
> >> get
> >> around to implementin
I remembered people complaining how glibc ignores NSS errors with
getpwent(), so I thought I'd see how easy it is to use NSS directly.
Unless I misunderstood something, this should work:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/rev/c9b49ed99d28
Tested only with "files" backend. Also it won't work with Solar
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 14:15 -0400, Bruce Bodger wrote:
> Thank you, Timo. One more thing: would you explain the existence of
> this file:
>
> -rw--- 1 bb admin 131104 Jun 27 21:32 dovecot.index.log.2
>
> I can understand dovecot-keywords having the old creation date but
> dovecot.
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 19:55 +0200, Peter Eriksson wrote:
> Btw. I think that the Heimdal implementation of GSSAPI has a similar
> function but called gss_userok() (without the leading two "_"
> characters) that does something similar - and users of Heimdal around
> that can verify or deny that?
On Jul 2, 2007, at 1:25 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 06:23 -0400, Bruce Bodger wrote:
Haven't seen a thread discussing forcing rebuilding of indexes /
cache, so the question is, if these files in a users home directory
were deleted...
-rw--- 1 bb admin 80 May 1
Timo Sirainen skrev:
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 18:08 +0200, Peter Eriksson wrote:
+ AC_CHECK_LIB(gss, __gss_userok, [
+ AC_DEFINE(HAVE___GSS_USEROK,,
+ Define if you have
__gss_usero
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 06:23 -0400, Bruce Bodger wrote:
> Haven't seen a thread discussing forcing rebuilding of indexes /
> cache, so the question is, if these files in a users home directory
> were deleted...
>
> -rw--- 1 bb admin 80 May 17 15:05 dovecot-keywords
> -rw---
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 20:19 +0400, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
- Currently I strip domain part of the username returned, i.e. from
"DOMAIN\user" just to "user". Maybe better add some option
"auth_winbind_strip_domain" for this?
What if
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 18:08 +0200, Peter Eriksson wrote:
>
> + AC_CHECK_LIB(gss, __gss_userok, [
> + AC_DEFINE(HAVE___GSS_USEROK,,
> + Define if you have
> __gss_userok())
> +
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 20:19 +0400, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
> >> - Currently I strip domain part of the username returned, i.e. from
> >> "DOMAIN\user" just to "user". Maybe better add some option
> >> "auth_winbind_strip_domain" for this?
> >>
> >
> > What if you changed
Oh, another "hack" that's needed to build Dovecot on Solaris 10 with the
native GSS library is a very simple, dummy, "krb5-config" script. Please
find it also enclosed (probably not needed when Solaris 10 update 4 is
released).
- Peter
Peter Eriksson wrote:
Please find enclosed two patch file
Timo Sirainen wrote:
- Currently I strip domain part of the username returned, i.e. from
"DOMAIN\user" just to "user". Maybe better add some option
"auth_winbind_strip_domain" for this?
What if you changed it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then you could use Dovecot's
standard %n or %u variables.
Please find enclosed two patch files (one for configure.in and one for
src/mech/auth-gssapi.c) that fixes a problem in the GSSAPI code that
prevented Dovecot to successfully authenticate when using cross-realm
Kerberos credentials.
Unfortunately I think it'll only work on Solaris (it uses the
Haven't seen a thread discussing forcing rebuilding of indexes /
cache, so the question is, if these files in a users home directory
were deleted...
-rw--- 1 bb admin 80 May 17 15:05 dovecot-keywords
-rw--- 1 bb admin 85449 Jul 2 06:15 dovecot-uidlist
-rw---
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 00:17 +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
> > > Jun 22 15:08:58 mb11 dovecot: listen(143) failed: Interrupted system
> > > call
> >
> > Did you use killall? I think this happens only with it.
Not even with it actually. I was probably thinking about something else.
> Nope, this
Hi,
> I'd love some up-to-date packages for Dovecot on Etch. I need to get
> some practice in on my personal server before I migrate work... from
> 0.99.14 (Still going strong, Timo :)
You can get my 1.0.1 packages from
http://www.mertinkat.net/dovecot/
Built for Debian etch/i386.
Hope everythi
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 18:10 +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 10:51:17AM -0400, John Peacock wrote:
> > That isn't a terribly helpful error message, since it doesn't include the
> > original e-mail message, with headers, so that you could see what Mailman
> > thought
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
Actually, it does include the bounce with headers. The bounce seems to have
originated from 81.3.115.182, which reverse-resolves to
canville-182.adsl.newnet.co.uk.
Duh, of course you are right! I glanced at that block and thought that
was the dovecot.org server
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 16:19 +0400, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
> - I try to code things most close to used style, i.e. using Dovecot's
> memory-management and io-pipe routines etc., but could someone look at
> it and check whether I've missed something or not?
close() and dup2() errors should be repor
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:37:05 +0300 Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 15:20 +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
> > Jul 2 14:12:30 engtest03 dovecot: auth(default): pool auth request
> > handler: 104 / 4080 bytes Jul 2 14:12:30 engtest03 last message
> > repeated 128 tim
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 10:51:17AM -0400, John Peacock wrote:
> That isn't a terribly helpful error message, since it doesn't include the
> original e-mail message, with headers, so that you could see what Mailman
> thought the original Mail-From: address was (which is what is failing
> here)...
Hello Timo,
I've noticed that when slapd which I'm using as the passdb and the prefetched
userdb is restarted I have to restart dovecot. As a matter of fact, if I don't,
I get the following error :
--
Jul 2 16:38:39 dovecot: imap-login: Internal login failure: user=,
method=PLAIN, rip=xxx.
On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 01:43 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> #mail_max_user_connections = 10
Changed:
protocol imap {
# Maximum number of IMAP connections allowed for a user from each IP address.
# NOTE: The username is compared compared case-sensitively.
#mail_max_userip_connections = 10
}
p
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Unable to deliver message to the following address(es) dovecot@dovecot.org
Remote host said: 554 delivery error: This user doesn't have an
account
That isn't a terribly helpful error message, since it doesn't include
the original e-mail message, with headers, so that you c
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 15:20 +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
> Jul 2 14:12:30 engtest03 dovecot: auth(default): pool auth request handler:
> 104 / 4080 bytes
> Jul 2 14:12:30 engtest03 last message repeated 128 times
Auth request handler is created for each imap-login connection. So if
you have 1
Anyone have ideas why this happened? Nothing special in logs, all
[EMAIL PROTECTED] deliveries went OK. Mailman's bounce log is unhelpful. Why
does it say it tried to deliver to dovecot@dovecot.org and when it
failed it disabled my account? Why doesn't it even bother saying which
remote host gave a
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:32:11 +0200 (CEST) Steffen Kaiser
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Donnu, but I wouldn't enable a connection limit by default. Let the
> admin choose a correct value after "QuickStart" went well.
>
Agreed.
A per IP limit that defaults to something other than UNLIMITED and
wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007, Jürgen Herz wrote:
If you think about it, also take NATed networks into account. So it
would need a fairly high default and should have a remark in the comment
to make admins aware.
Yep!
A limit per IP is not enforcable in my
The Samba team recommends to use their "ntlm_auth" command line helper
for "NTLM" and "GSS-SPNEGO" authentication. This helper interacts with
the Samba's winbind daemon, and this way can authenticate users against
NT or Active Directory windows domain.
Currently Dovecot can do "NTLM" authenti
I did the ext3 -> ext4 switch on two of our proxyservers a few months
ago. Then we forgot (!) about that test and the boxes just kept
running and running and running ...
Interesting... have you noticed any differences in performance?
No. But at least it didn't explode in my face :)
Heh.. y
Haven't seen a thread discussing forcing rebuilding of indexes /
cache, so the question is, if these files in a users home directory
were deleted...
-rw--- 1 bb admin 80 May 17 15:05 dovecot-keywords
-rw--- 1 bb admin 85449 Jul 2 06:15 dovecot-uidlist
-rw---
33 matches
Mail list logo
