On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 18:10 +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 10:51:17AM -0400, John Peacock wrote: > > That isn't a terribly helpful error message, since it doesn't include the > > original e-mail message, with headers, so that you could see what Mailman > > thought the original Mail-From: address was (which is what is failing > > here)... > > Actually, it does include the bounce with headers. The bounce seems to have > originated from 81.3.115.182, which reverse-resolves to > canville-182.adsl.newnet.co.uk.
Right, thanks. I didn't notice that. Banned the IP, hopefully it's not dynamic. :) > First guess is, something is seriously broken in that host. Another guess is > that Mailman just scanned the bounce for subscriber addresses and found > [EMAIL PROTECTED], given that the bounce wasn't formatted in any standard way. I wish Mailman supported some kind of hashes in bounce addresses.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
