Hi Timo,
Thnx one of the error is gone due to duplicate passdbs, thnx. However
following error is persistant. I restarted my sendmail, dovecot etc.
changed the group permission as you mentioned.
Jun 28 10:19:47 webmail sm-mta[19653]: l5S5Jl1Z019649: Warning: program
/usr/local/libexec/doveco
On Jun 27, 2007, at 1:30 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 00:18 -0700, Mark Edwards wrote:
I have the following set in the main level of my dovecot.conf file:
mail_location = maildir:/var/mail/virtual/%u
I decided to enable the lda protocol for local delivery from postfix,
so I
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 14:46 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
I don't understand why you have so many "OK Still here" notifications
there though. They're sent 2 minutes apart from each others, but between
EXISTS/EXPUNGE there should be max. 1 minute. Wonder if
On Jun 27, 2007, at 2:46 PM, Robert Fraser wrote:
Thanks for the help on this.
We are on Ubuntu Dapper server - and beta3 is what we get :-)
We'll do a
manual install of a later version.
Cheers
Rob
FYI, you can use prevu to manually backport a newer version, that's
the easiest way. I'
Thanks for the help on this.
We are on Ubuntu Dapper server - and beta3 is what we get :-) We'll do a
manual install of a later version.
Cheers
Rob
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 09:04 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Do you have a core file from that crash? It would show a bit more
> >information. If not, see http://dovecot.org/bugreport.html
>
> I finally got around to generating one. It's 3MB, and was generated from
> 1.0.0. Would you like a cop
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 10:59 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Here's our situation: Migrating from UW-IMAP. Have lots (as in, tens of
> thousands) of clients set up using '~/mail' as the IMAP root, and using
> subscriptions.
See if the attached patch fixes everything. I'll add it to v1.1.
diff
No, ext3 would be fine. I just thought /srv might point to NFS or
something. This is a bit weird though. There shouldn't be any bugs like
this with local filesystems.
You could try if mmap_disable=no would change anything, or
lock_method=flock or even lock_method=dotlock.
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 18
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 17:56 +0100, Dave Hatton wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm having a problem with a user running outlook 2003 against dovecot 1.0.1.
>
> A second user works fine and I haven't moved on to create a third (or more
> yet).
>
> On a send and receive I get an error from outlook
>
> "Task 'Ch
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 00:18 -0700, Mark Edwards wrote:
> I have the following set in the main level of my dovecot.conf file:
>
> mail_location = maildir:/var/mail/virtual/%u
>
> I decided to enable the lda protocol for local delivery from postfix,
> so I could use sieve plugins. The lda protoc
On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 14:39 -0500, Steven F Siirila wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 01:24:46PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 14:07 -0500, Steven F Siirila wrote:
> > > > Hmm. I wonder how much of a timing window is left; this could be a
> > > > viable
> > > > option for u
On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 23:25 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 00:03 +0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am using ver 1.0.1 and getting the following errors in mail.log and
> > auth.log respectively. However I can login to imap
Oh, didn't notice this.
> > Jun 27 2
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 00:03 +0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using ver 1.0.1 and getting the following errors in mail.log and
> auth.log respectively. However I can login to imap and retrieve emails no
> problem, while sending email is also ok.
>
> Jun 27 23:59:21 webmail sm-mta[188
On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 13:53 -0400, Flannery, Andrew wrote:
> I'm trying to change the PAM_USER within a pam module, and observed that
> dovecot 0.99 does not support this. I then looked at 1.x and found:
..
> /* FIXME: this doesn't actually work since we're in the child
>
>proc
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 16:49 +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
> > You could try http://dovecot.org/patches/debug/mempool-accounting.diff
> > and send USR1 signal to dovecot-auth after a while. It logs how much
> > memory is used by all existing memory pools. Each auth request has its
> > own pool, so
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 10:05 -0700, Benton Haynes wrote:
> So it's not dying at least at startup. Maybe an easier way would be to
> > make the process dump core and gdb the core file. See
> > http://dovecot.org/bugreport.html#coredumps
>
>
> I'm still not clear how one gets gdb to exec 'imap' WITH
On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 12:46 +0200, damien chambe - EGS wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Since my migration to SUSE SLES 10, I have a new error message :
>
> dovecot1 dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): inotify_init()
> failed: Too many open files
% cat /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_instances
128
Do you ha
Hi,
I am using ver 1.0.1 and getting the following errors in mail.log and
auth.log respectively. However I can login to imap and retrieve emails no
problem, while sending email is also ok.
Jun 27 23:59:21 webmail sm-mta[1889]: l5RIvhQE001865: Warning: program
/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver un
Hi,
I'm trying to change the PAM_USER within a pam module, and observed that
dovecot 0.99 does not support this. I then looked at 1.x and found:
src/auth/passdb-pam.c:232:
/* FIXME: this doesn't actually work since we're in the child
process.. */
status = p
Robert Fraser wrote:
Hi
We are using Thunderbird 2.0.0.x (Linux and Windows) with IMAP accounts
against Dovecot 1.0.beta3 on Ubuntu 6.06 Dapper with Maildir.
It is all working well except when we rename a folder in the public
namespace, the person who renames it can no longer see the contents o
Rick Romero wrote:
Unfortunately I'm not a Blackberry user, but I know IMAP clients are
hard to find. So I can't comment on it's usability or features, but I
thought I'd give it a little press for his quick response :)
I'm a LogicMail user and it's great, I second your interactions with
Dere
On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 07:50 -0600, Ben Schumacher wrote:
> This somewhat
> conflicts with dovecot's authentication system, which expects to have
> all the necessary authentication information internally and is not
> design (not willing?) to trust a checkpassword-style authentication
> mechanism to
On 6/25/07, John Peacock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ben Schumacher wrote:
> I would like to see this, too. After digging through the code some, it
> seems that the major sticking point is that dovecot would prefer to do
> the CRAM-MD5 internally and therefore expects to have access to the
> passw
FYI - I just had a great interaction with the developer of this
software. LogicMail for Blackberry is a true IMAP/POP client for
Blackberry, which wasn't working correctly with Dovecot's IMAP.
I merely posted in the sourceforge forums and got a VERY fast response
with a working fix. http://l
On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 14:46 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> I don't understand why you have so many "OK Still here" notifications
> there though. They're sent 2 minutes apart from each others, but between
> EXISTS/EXPUNGE there should be max. 1 minute. Wonder if there's a bug in
> timeout handling co
Hello santhosh,
santhosh, 11.06.2007 (d.m.y):
> How to create users in the dovecott ?
Dovecot cannot administer a user list of its own. Instead, you can
"connect" it to whatever user administration tool your system is
using, e.g. LDAP, MySQL or "plain" passwd-like files.
Gruss/Regards,
Christia
On 6/27/07, damien chambe - EGS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Timo Sirainen a écrit :
> On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 00:28 +0200, damien chambe - EGS wrote:
>
>
>> Our Dovecot server had to be changed due to a hardware problem
>> I was forced to use SUSE SLES 10 for the new one, instead of SLES 9 on
>> the
Robert Fraser, on 6/27/2007 12:34 AM, said the following:
Hi
We are using Thunderbird 2.0.0.x (Linux and Windows) with IMAP accounts
against Dovecot 1.0.beta3 on Ubuntu 6.06 Dapper with Maildir.
It is all working well except when we rename a folder in the public
namespace, the person who rename
On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 23:16 -1000, Julian Cowley wrote:
> * 7941 EXISTS
>
> [At some point after this, something happens (or doesn't happen) and
> dovecot no longer notifies of new messages. The other client is still
> reading messages in the same mailbox and new mail is still arriving.]
>
> * O
Hello all,
Since my migration to SUSE SLES 10, I have a new error message :
dovecot1 dovecot: IMAP([EMAIL PROTECTED]): inotify_init()
failed: Too many open files
It seems to occurs when thunderbird is idle, or when I click on sub folders
I have a ulimit for open files a bit low, 1024
I have cha
Timo Sirainen a écrit :
> On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 00:28 +0200, damien chambe - EGS wrote:
>
>
>> Our Dovecot server had to be changed due to a hardware problem
>> I was forced to use SUSE SLES 10 for the new one, instead of SLES 9 on
>> the old server.
>>
>
> The kernel matters a lot with NFS
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, Julian Cowley wrote:
* OK Still here
* OK Still here
* OK Still here
* OK Still here
* OK Still here
[The above message repeated another 30 times here. Finally, IDLE
mode is terminated:]
* OK Still here
DONE
* 7941 EXPUNGE
A0017 OK Idle completed.
I think I've found an a
32 matches
Mail list logo
