Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
When starting, dovecot reports being 1.0.0 instaead of 1.0.1rc3!!
Don't worry, plenty of time to get that right - judging from previous
releases there's probably another 20 or so release candidates to go ;)
True -- however, two points: 1) we probably won't stay with the 'mbox'
format forever, and 2) we would like to use the Sieve plugin, which I
believe requires use of Dovecot LDA.
Please set up a system using that plugin and make sure it does everything
you need it to. I had multiple problems wi
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:43:26PM -0700, Jason Fesler wrote:
> >We are running Dovecot 1.0.0 using mbox format (currently in the midst
> >of conversion from UW IMAP). We discovered today that the Dovecot LDA
> >is accessing the user's INBOX at delivery time! Not only do our users
>
> If you're
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 06:22:45AM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 17:52 -0500, Steven F Siirila wrote:
> > We are running Dovecot 1.0.0 using mbox format (currently in the midst
> > of conversion from UW IMAP). We discovered today that the Dovecot LDA
> > is accessing the user
We are running Dovecot 1.0.0 using mbox format (currently in the midst
of conversion from UW IMAP). We discovered today that the Dovecot LDA
is accessing the user's INBOX at delivery time! Not only do our users
If you're willing to pass on delivery-time indexing, and you assign one
unix uid p
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 17:52 -0500, Steven F Siirila wrote:
> We are running Dovecot 1.0.0 using mbox format (currently in the midst
> of conversion from UW IMAP). We discovered today that the Dovecot LDA
> is accessing the user's INBOX at delivery time!
Well, there are two things:
1) It always m
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:30:52PM -0400, John Peacock wrote:
> Steven F Siirila wrote:
> > We are running Dovecot 1.0.0 using mbox format (currently in the midst
> > of conversion from UW IMAP). We discovered today that the Dovecot LDA
> > is accessing the user's INBOX at delivery time!
>
> Umm,
Steven F Siirila wrote:
> We are running Dovecot 1.0.0 using mbox format (currently in the midst
> of conversion from UW IMAP). We discovered today that the Dovecot LDA
> is accessing the user's INBOX at delivery time!
Umm, yeah, that's kind of the point. mbox format is one big file with all of
Mark Nienberg spake the following on 6/13/2007 4:04 PM:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
>
>>
>> Are people interested in seeing 1.0.1rcX packaged?
>
> Not the RC, but I'm on the edge of my seat to see if 1.0.1 final is
> available on ATrpms before end of life for Fedora Core 5.
>
> Mark
>
>
That gives it
We are running Dovecot 1.0.0 using mbox format (currently in the midst
of conversion from UW IMAP). We discovered today that the Dovecot LDA
is accessing the user's INBOX at delivery time! Not only do our users
rely on this access time being when they last accessed their e-mail,
we also rely on i
Axel Thimm wrote:
Are people interested in seeing 1.0.1rcX packaged?
Not the RC, but I'm on the edge of my seat to see if 1.0.1 final is available on
ATrpms before end of life for Fedora Core 5.
Mark
(Dovecot 1.0.rc15)
Hello I'm tring to configure postfix+dovecot on debian etch.
In dovecot I use passdb pam and userdb passwd-file. I can connect pop3
clients and reveice mails
and connect smtp clients and send mails, but it is delivered to
/var/mail/%u instead the configured
mailboxes in /va
* Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> http://dovecot.org/tmp/dovecot-1.0.1rc3.tar.gz
>
> Looks like I managed to do a lot of changes today. So I'll wait a few
> more days before v1.0.1 release. The important changes since rc2:
>
> + deliver: Added -e parameter to write rejection error to s
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 15:46 -0300, Bruno Puga wrote:
> With postfix using virtual_mailbox_maps through the same ldap backend, I can
> make subtree searchs in the Active Directory without problems.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> I really need this information and appreciate any help or new ideas!
I've no ide
Hi everyone,
I am planning to upgrade my current uw-imap to dovecot. I am using Linux
(Redhat EL 4). The main purpose is to use maildir instead of mbox.
For some reason, I don't want to upgrade all users' mail boxes all at a
time, but I want to change the imap server first (to dovecot), while
With postfix using virtual_mailbox_maps through the same ldap backend, I can
make subtree searchs in the Active Directory without problems.
Any ideas?
I really need this information and appreciate any help or new ideas!
Thanks
Bruno.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bruno Puga <
David Favor spake the following on 6/12/2007 7:12 PM:
> Wade Smart wrote:
>> Im looking on the dovecot documentation about how to update the folder
>> structure.
>> I had some computer problems so I back up my mail and when I
>> reinstalled I got rid of a bunch of unused old mail. But now when I
>>
I have an installation that sometimes acts strangely:
Jun 12 11:28:00 mail dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=,
method=PLAIN, rip=10.10.10.103, lip=10.10.10.254
Jun 12 11:53:59 mail dovecot: IMAP(nadia):
inotify_add_watch(/var/spool/mail/nadia/new) failed: No such file or
directory
Jun 12 11:53:
I had some computer problems so I back up my mail and when I
reinstalled I got rid of a bunch of unused old mail. But now when I
open my mail client it still things all of those folders are still
there. Im looking for how to update the file on what is and isnt
there.
This depends on your mail c
On 2007-06-13, 14:29, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 11:00 +0200, Erland Nylend wrote:
> > deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Jun 13 10:36:29 Info:
> > msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: save failed to
> > INBOX: Unknown error
>
> This is what I was afraid of first. "Unknown error" means that
> som
On 2007-06-13, 14:29, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 11:00 +0200, Erland Nylend wrote:
> > deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Jun 13 10:36:29 Info:
> > msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: save failed to
> > INBOX: Unknown error
>
> This is what I was afraid of first. "Unknown error" means that some
Timo Sirainen said:
> Do you mean that you want to have [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> have the same password but different maildirs?
Yes. Basically using the domain part as a variable :)
> What passdb and userdb
> are you using? I don't think there's a way to do this with auth_*
> set
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 02:16:55PM +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 02:43:47PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> Thanks for your answer.
One more thing : is sending a sighup to the master sufficient for a
change to parameters such as 'count' or 'login_process_per_connection'
to
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 02:43:47PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Thanks for your answer.
> it creates a new connection to auth-worker socket.
all the workers and the auth process communicate through a single unix
socket, doesn't they ?
> Auth workers are used only with MySQL auth, or if you're us
On 2007-06-12, 21:27, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Anyway, if the failure is non-critical such as "quota exceeded",
> Dovecot doesn't currently log anything. If the save wouldn't have
> succeeded, it would have given the error message in rejection
> mail. This patch makes it log the error always:
> http:
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 11:04 +0200, Thomas Hummel wrote:
> Hello Timo,
>
> I've got some questions about dovecot-auth processes which I cannot
> answer just by reading the doc :
>
> [ Note : my problem is that I often see
>
>dovecot: pop3-login: Can't connect to auth server at default: Conne
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 15:55 +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
> Ah, that sounds like a plan. And seeing that 1.0 does not create an
> empty default dovecot-keywords file when accessed by pop3, I presume
> I could just get rid of these (the "" ones) altogether, right?
Yep
signature.asc
Descript
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 16:43 +1200, Robert Coup wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I want to authenticate a pop3 user without a domain part and then use
> the domain part to specify a Maildir subfolder to grab messages from.
>
> So, this was my attempt:
> # use the domain part to access a subfolder
> ma
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 11:00 +0200, Erland Nylend wrote:
> deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Jun 13 10:36:29 Info:
> msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: save failed to
> INBOX: Unknown error
This is what I was afraid of first. "Unknown error" means that some
function returned -1, but didn't set an error message.
On 06/13/07 Axel wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 10:01:13PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > http://dovecot.org/tmp/dovecot-1.0.1rc3.tar.gz
> Are people interested in seeing 1.0.1rcX packaged?
With mysql going just great :)
maciek
--
_0_ Maciej Friedel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
__0 http://wwv.pl -
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 10:01:13PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> http://dovecot.org/tmp/dovecot-1.0.1rc3.tar.gz
>
> Looks like I managed to do a lot of changes today. So I'll wait a few
> more days before v1.0.1 release. The important changes since rc2:
>
> + deliver: Added -e parameter to
Hello Timo,
I've got some questions about dovecot-auth processes which I cannot
answer just by reading the doc :
[ Note : my problem is that I often see
dovecot: pop3-login: Can't connect to auth server at default: Connection
refused
and I'm looking for a way to tweak dovecot.conf paramete
On 2007-06-12, 21:27, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 18:54 +0200, Erland Nylend wrote:
>
> > deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Jun 12 18:30:57 Info: msgid=<[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]>: save failed to INBOX
> > deliver([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Jun 12 18:30:57 Info: msgid=<[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]>: sa
33 matches
Mail list logo
