It's actually pretty easy to get man pages out of the XML
if you go via DocBook. Recent versions of the docbook-xsl stylesheets
include the db2man XSL mentioned in STATUS for converting a DocBook
into a man page. I've attached the XSL I used to go from
to , and the httpd.1 produced from httpd.x
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 04:04:14PM +0100, André Malo wrote:
> * Joe Orton wrote:
>
> > It's actually pretty easy to get man pages out of the XML
> > if you go via DocBook. Recent versions of the docbook-xsl stylesheets
> > include the db2man XSL mentioned in ST
1) use .SS not .Sh for subheadings, and don't capitalize
these headings. The groff_man manpage says .SS is the macro to
use for subheadings.
2) remove indents for lists - these just create too much
whitespace. It's normal for man page options list to have the same
indentation level for the firs
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 01:51:45PM +0100, André Malo wrote:
> * Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 1) use .SS not .Sh for subheadings, and don't capitalize
> > these headings. The groff_man manpage says .SS is the macro to
> > use for subheadings.
>
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 08:30:49AM -0500, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On a related not, I'd like to discuss whether we want to have UserDir
> disabled by default.
> Pros) Improved default security
> Cons) Increased tech support questions about enabling this feature
I agree it should be disabled by default
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 04:48:17PM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
> I've been developing the opinion that we are in need of a less-structured
> place where we can put "solutions to common problems". We used to use the
> FAQ for this, but getting the structure right and finding people to do the
> ma
We keep seeing people confused that %[bB] mean different things in 2.0
to 1.3, and the docs don't really do a lot to help here. Something like
this is more accurate and useful, I think: any comments?
Index: mod/mod_log_config.xml
===
This looks really good - any objections to back-porting it to 2.0.x?
joe
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 10:38:20AM +1000, Jason Lingohr wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 12:25:14PM +0200, Andrà Malo wrote:
>
> > * Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > This looks really good - any objections to back-porting it to 2.0.x?
> >
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 06:03:42PM +0100, Noirin Plunkett wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 08:28:41PM +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 03:20:54PM +0100, Noirin Plunkett wrote:
> > > I've been going through the mod_ssl docs, and have some fixes and
> > > language changes t
After getting bored with writing these into bugzilla for the umpteenth
time, does this look OK?
Index: xdocs/dev/debugging.xml
===
--- xdocs/dev/debugging.xml (revision 278729)
+++ xdocs/dev/debugging.xml (working copy)
@@ -1
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 02:33:37PM +0100, Noirin Plunkett wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 01:53:12PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> > After getting bored with writing these into bugzilla for the umpteenth
> > time, does this look OK?
>
> Looks good, just a few style/readabil
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 07:12:12AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> We discussed different patches previously on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to make some of
> this stuff more obvious by reporting configuration issues to the error
> log at startup. Is that worth revisiting?
> As I recall, the critical question w
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 05:38:40AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On 10/29/05, Jason Lingohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Addressing a point in the STATUS file for 2.x, I've put together a quick
> > manpage for checkgid.
>
> Does anybody consider that program useful? (doc it or yank it?)
No,
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:38:14PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> httpd 2.0's configure --help (or the online doc) goes:
>
> --disable-FEATURE
> Do not include FEATURE. This is the same as --enable-FEATURE=no.
> --enable-FEATURE[=ARG]
> Include FEATURE. The default value for ARG is yes.
> [..
http://people.apache.org/~jorton/output-filters.html
How does this look? Anything missed out, anything that doesn't make
sense? I think this covers most of the major problems in output filters
which keep coming up.
I'd also like to add a simple buffering filter which "does things right"
and
Again, thanks for the review!
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 07:44:02AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> I guess I'm confused about the up/down direction convention for output
> filters? I thought passing the next output filter is "down" and
> returning to the prior input filter is "up"?
My confusion - I
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 03:25:09AM -0600, William Rowe wrote:
> On 11/18/2011 4:38 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> > After several prods, it seems the security@ and hackathon participants
> > can't be drawn out of their shells on to dev@. So I'll simply call for
> > a majority vote on the followi
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:43:36AM -0500, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> Try to svn up your docs/manual/build/ subdir, it is a different checkout.
>
> Maybe we need to revision that directory with a reference rev under docs/
> so we don't actually regress the generated docs when the build toolchain
>
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 08:45:02PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> If java 9+, then have a look at
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/039a5815481ac297931cd08e759a90388a620eb6ea7aaecfcf97457f@%3Cdocs.httpd.apache.org%3E
>
> The issue with man pages is reported (with a possible work-around a
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 09:03:46AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Do we need to change something?
> ==
> [X] this mail is too long, do whatever you want, I just want something that
> works
> [ ] no. I can leave with the current tool chain
> [X] yes. Let clean some du
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:09:07AM -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> Since the documentation offered uses an example of invoking a .pl script,
> the docs are clearly wrong with respect to this feature. It is likely a
> regression
> which changed when the option to specify the user/group was added.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 10:08:12AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 19/08/2020 à 09:47, Joe Orton a écrit :
> > Stupid question, why do we need to change the suffix to .utf8 to convert
> > these files into UTF-8?
>
> I don't think it is needed, just a matter of co
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 09:49:21AM -0500, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 9:35 AM Joe Orton wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 10:08:12AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > > Le 19/08/2020 à 09:47, Joe Orton a écrit :
> > > > Stupid quest
24 matches
Mail list logo
