Hello Rich,
According to the first point could be may fault? im not sure, because i
have been working on the trunk since early beginning, and i migrate some
files to the 2.4 and older doc versions when i don´t forget of course haha.
Old stuff point, in my opinion it depends on how old this is, if
Hello,
I'm Daniel Ferradal, as Richard Bowen says, I plan to help translating to
Spanish in the best way I can.
To me this is all new, so when I saw in the httpd.apache.org which is the
method you guys use to define the documentation, I did a checkout of
httpd-2.4 and trunk and saw 2.4 had fewer
Hello Daniel
And of course welcome, here its a useful link to keep track on the
translation status of the branches:
http://people.apache.org/~takashi/translation-status/test.html
:)
Si tienes alguna duda, como trductor Español también no dudes en
contactarme.
Regards.
Linkedin: https://linkd.i
[Reporting a discussion happened on IRC]
2016-10-19 15:24 GMT+02:00 Rich Bowen :
>
>
> * We have translations that are grossly out of date. We should drop
> them. It remains only to define what "tool old" means? If a translation
> hasn't been touched since 2.4.0, I would recommend dropping it. Dis
* Rich Bowen wrote:
> * We have translations that are grossly out of date. We should drop
> them. It remains only to define what "tool old" means? If a translation
> hasn't been touched since 2.4.0, I would recommend dropping it.
> Discussion?
Guilty... However, I think, it would be waste to thr
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 09:36:51PM +0200, André Malo wrote:
> * Rich Bowen wrote:
> > * We have translations that are grossly out of date. We should drop
> > them. It remains only to define what "tool old" means? If a translation
> > hasn't been touched since 2.4.0, I would recommend dropping it.
>
