Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2020-06-12 Thread Christophe JAILLET
Le 30/09/2018 à 17:52, Lucien Gentis a écrit : Le 29/09/2018 à 15:42, Lucien Gentis a écrit : Le 29/09/2018 à 09:03, Christophe JAILLET a écrit : Hi, There is a bug in the Xalan, the XSLT 1.0 engine we are using, that prevents our doc building tool chain to generate correct documentation.

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2020-03-29 Thread Eric Covener
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 3:03 AM Christophe JAILLET wrote: > > Hi, > > There is a bug in the Xalan, the XSLT 1.0 engine we are using, that > prevents our doc building tool chain to generate correct documentation. > > By not correct, I mean: > - ISO-8859-1 non ASCII characters are replaced again

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2020-02-29 Thread Christophe JAILLET
Le 20/02/2020 à 23:23, André Malo a écrit : Rich Bowen wrote: On 1/9/20 2:14 AM, André Malo wrote: If you'd ask me, I'd rather kill XML/XSLT entirely, as the promises both for Java and XML/XSLT clearly don't hold anymore. However this also requires time and effort... Revisiting a thread that s

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2020-02-26 Thread Lucien Gentis
There are also these discussions at https://lists.apache.org/list.html?docs@httpd.apache.org:2018-9 : "HTML entities" and ** "[VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain" I then migrated french doc toward UTF-8 without a problem and could forget HTML entities.

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2020-02-21 Thread Mike Rumph
Found a bug report related to this which was last changed on 2018-08-06: Bug 57878 - Using UTF-8 for all languages, and avoiding html-entities. - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57878 Mike On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 2:23 PM André Malo wrote: > Rich Bowen wrote: > > On 1/9/20 2:14 AM

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2020-02-20 Thread André Malo
Rich Bowen wrote: > On 1/9/20 2:14 AM, André Malo wrote: > > If you'd ask me, I'd rather kill XML/XSLT entirely, as the promises both > > for Java and XML/XSLT clearly don't hold anymore. However this also > > requires time and effort... > > Revisiting a thread that somewhat died out ... I would a

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2020-02-20 Thread Luis Gil de Bernabé
I vote up for any upgrade. El jue., 20 feb. 2020 19:28, Tim Bannister escribió: > The cloud native computing foundation (especially Kubernetes) is largely > using Hugo and it seems to work well. > > Tim > > On 20 February 2020 18:16:11 Rich Bowen wrote: > > > On 1/9/20 2:14 AM, André Malo wrot

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2020-02-20 Thread Tim Bannister
The cloud native computing foundation (especially Kubernetes) is largely using Hugo and it seems to work well. Tim On 20 February 2020 18:16:11 Rich Bowen wrote: On 1/9/20 2:14 AM, André Malo wrote: If you'd ask me, I'd rather kill XML/XSLT entirely, as the promises both for Java and XML/XS

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2020-02-20 Thread Rich Bowen
On 1/9/20 2:14 AM, André Malo wrote: If you'd ask me, I'd rather kill XML/XSLT entirely, as the promises both for Java and XML/XSLT clearly don't hold anymore. However this also requires time and effort... Revisiting a thread that somewhat died out ... I would also be very much in favor of

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2020-01-08 Thread André Malo
On Mittwoch, 8. Januar 2020 22:33:19 CET Christophe JAILLET wrote: > Hi Eric, > > I was just about to remind @dev about this known issue. > > Yes, interested to dig further, but honestly, I lack time since several > months. > If I recollect correctly: > - there is still some corner issues wit

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2020-01-08 Thread Christophe JAILLET
Hi Eric, I was just about to remind @dev about this known issue. Yes, interested to dig further, but honestly, I lack time since several months. If I recollect correctly:    - there is still some corner issues with saxon. (and a few patches already in trunk, waiting for 2.4.x)    - it is not

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2020-01-07 Thread Eric Covener
Digging around in docs-build via Mikes recent thread reminded me of all this. Christophe, any interest/cycles to revisit? It might be nice to move up before this analysis ages too much. My thought to proceed after reviewing the thread: Should we collaborate on a new docs-build w/ java8 min, ext

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2018-10-06 Thread Luca Toscano
Il giorno mar 2 ott 2018 alle ore 15:55 Rainer Jung ha scritto: > > Am 29.09.2018 um 09:03 schrieb Christophe JAILLET: > > Do we need to change something? > > == > > [ ] this mail is too long, do whatever you want, I just want something > > that works > > [ ] no. I can

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2018-10-05 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 10/02/2018 05:08 PM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 09:03:46AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: >> Do we need to change something? >> == >> [X] this mail is too long, do whatever you want, I just want something that >> works >> [ ] no. I can leave with

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2018-10-02 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 5:21 AM Tom Fredrik Blenning wrote: > > On 02/10/2018 02:28, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > > > Very concerned about trusting utf-8 for anything that is expected to be > > console > > readable. Not as much the xml/html decorated contents, but the man pages > > and any text fi

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2018-10-02 Thread Joe Orton
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 09:03:46AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > Do we need to change something? > == > [X] this mail is too long, do whatever you want, I just want something that > works > [ ] no. I can leave with the current tool chain > [X] yes. Let clean some du

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2018-10-02 Thread Rich Bowen
I, for one, would love to see us move to something MarkDown based. However, 1) that would be a HUGE amount of work and 2) it would take a lot more work to make something MD-based support all of the fancy features that we have hacked into our existing engine over the years. However, I must also

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2018-10-02 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 29.09.2018 um 09:03 schrieb Christophe JAILLET: Do we need to change something? == [ ] this mail is too long, do whatever you want, I just want something that works [ ] no. I can leave with the current tool chain [X] yes. Let clean some dust and update what is nee

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2018-10-02 Thread Tom Fredrik Blenning
On 02/10/2018 02:28, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 4:15 PM Luis Gil de Bernabé > wrote: > >> I have updated long ago the files from es, but i wasn't sure to commit >> them as the FR file Lucien is saying. >> So now i'm sure it could be done, i will add them to trunk (es >> m

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2018-10-02 Thread Lucien Gentis
Le 02/10/2018 à 08:57, André Malo a écrit : On Montag, 1. Oktober 2018 23:14:58 CEST Luis Gil de Bernabé wrote: I have updated long ago the files from es, but i wasn't sure to commit them as the FR file Lucien is saying. So now i'm sure it could be done, i will add them to trunk (es modificat

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2018-10-01 Thread André Malo
On Montag, 1. Oktober 2018 23:14:58 CEST Luis Gil de Bernabé wrote: > I have updated long ago the files from es, but i wasn't sure to commit > them as the FR file Lucien is saying. > So now i'm sure it could be done, i will add them to trunk (es > modification only) Side note here. All UTF-8 targe

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2018-10-01 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 4:15 PM Luis Gil de Bernabé wrote: > I have updated long ago the files from es, but i wasn't sure to commit > them as the FR file Lucien is saying. > So now i'm sure it could be done, i will add them to trunk (es > modification only) > > @Christophe JAILLET im not helpful

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2018-10-01 Thread Luis Gil de Bernabé
I have updated long ago the files from es, but i wasn't sure to commit them as the FR file Lucien is saying. So now i'm sure it could be done, i will add them to trunk (es modification only) @Christophe JAILLET im not helpfull here, but i vote +1 to update our build tool :) rgd On Mon, 1 Oct 20

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2018-10-01 Thread Christophe JAILLET
Le 29/09/2018 à 15:27, Eric Covener a écrit : As per Xalan documentation, the JDK or JRE 1.3.x (2000), 1.4.x (2002), or 5.x (2004) is required. As per our doc build documentation, we need at least Java 1.2 (1998) to build the doc. Java 8 (2014) is LTS and is supported until 2025 Java 9 (2017) Jav

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2018-09-30 Thread Lucien Gentis
Le 29/09/2018 à 15:42, Lucien Gentis a écrit : Le 29/09/2018 à 09:03, Christophe JAILLET a écrit : Hi, There is a bug in the Xalan, the XSLT 1.0 engine we are using, that prevents our doc building tool chain to generate correct documentation. By not correct, I mean:    - ISO-8859-1 non

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2018-09-29 Thread Lucien Gentis
Le 29/09/2018 à 09:03, Christophe JAILLET a écrit : Hi, There is a bug in the Xalan, the XSLT 1.0 engine we are using, that prevents our doc building tool chain to generate correct documentation. By not correct, I mean:    - ISO-8859-1 non ASCII characters are replaced again by their HTML

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2018-09-29 Thread Eric Covener
> As per Xalan documentation, the JDK or JRE 1.3.x (2000), 1.4.x (2002), > or 5.x (2004) is required. > As per our doc build documentation, we need at least Java 1.2 (1998) to > build the doc. > Java 8 (2014) is LTS and is supported until 2025 > Java 9 (2017) > Java 10 (2018) > Java 11 (2018) is ap

Re: [VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2018-09-29 Thread Christophe JAILLET
Le 29/09/2018 à 09:03, Christophe JAILLET a écrit : Hi, There is a bug in the Xalan, the XSLT 1.0 engine we are using, that prevents our doc building tool chain to generate correct documentation. By not correct, I mean:    - ISO-8859-1 non ASCII characters are replaced again by their HTML en

[VOTE] Update our documentation building tool chain

2018-09-29 Thread Christophe JAILLET
Hi, There is a bug in the Xalan, the XSLT 1.0 engine we are using, that prevents our doc building tool chain to generate correct documentation. By not correct, I mean:    - ISO-8859-1 non ASCII characters are replaced again by their HTML entities equivalent (in the French doc for example)