On 09/12/2015 03:09, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> There are ways to document the differences where they exist.
This gets into what qualifies as a difference that is significant enough
to mention:
# How many people realize that:
* different versions of Java behave differently. Doesn't matter if
LibO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18/01/2016 22:22, David Lloyd-Jones wrote:
> Fundamentally, why should software need documenting?
AOo obviously includes all of the functionality that is requested in
3959. Making use of that functionality is highly non-obvious, and
arguably anti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/01/2016 23:02, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> I think that having a structure for contributors finding work and also
finding any guidance they need is a great idea.
One individual whose sole function is to say: "Do this", and then
follows up week
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21/01/2016 19:47, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> this license or that license,
ASF pretty much dictates that the Apache License be used.
>wiki based or not etc etc. ad infinitum.
That is a clash of psycho-epistemological Weltanschauung. A clash that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21/01/2016 23:26, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> Actually that is incorrect.
You're not looking at psycho-demographic groups, based upon their
preferred formats for receiving new data.
What the documentation states it is focused upon means squat.
> b
On 22/01/2016 02:30, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>> How justifiable is it to disparage what is currently going on when
doing nothing to alleviate the problem.
I realize that there are some who think that pointing out that there is
no new product, is disparaging of the organization that did not make a
