Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns-01.txt

2015-12-23 Thread Howard, Lee
From: George Michaelson mailto:g...@algebras.org>> Date: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 at 5:39 PM To: dnsop WG mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>>, Lee Howard mailto:lee.how...@twcable.com>> Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns-01.txt I want to dispute one part of this: the "DNSSEC ma

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns

2016-05-02 Thread Howard, Lee
Sorry for not replying last week; I somehow got unsubscribed from the list a few days before WGLC was started. So let me reply to a few points made so far: Privacy Considerations (Christian Huitema) Thanks to you and other for pointing out this gap. How about: Change Title of "4. Security Consi

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns

2016-05-02 Thread Howard, Lee
>So, ISPs not doing reverse DNS for IPv6, like my current ISP, are making it >impossible to use your own mail server to deliver mail over IPv6. I think >they are doing a serious disservice to the open internet. That's a separate conversation. If your ISP allows you to run a mail server on the se

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns

2016-05-03 Thread Howard, Lee
On 5/3/16, 5:00 AM, "Stephane Bortzmeyer" wrote: >On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 08:59:45PM +0000, > Howard, Lee wrote > a message of 289 lines which said: > >> Having forward and reverse match isn't BCP (Stephane Bortzmeyer, and >> others) > >No, that was

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns

2016-05-03 Thread Howard, Lee
On 5/3/16, 11:14 AM, "Stephane Bortzmeyer" wrote: >On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 09:03:20PM +0000, > Howard, Lee wrote > a message of 159 lines which said: > >> If your ISP allows you to run a mail server on the service you buy, > >I think this nicely summarizes

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns

2016-05-06 Thread Howard, Lee
Yes; will fix (I think I said in another message). Off today, will catch up again next week. Lee From: DNSOP mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of Ted Lemon mailto:mel...@fugue.com>> Date: Friday, May 6, 2016 7:26 AM To: "sth...@nethelp.no" mailto:sth...@nethel

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns

2016-05-09 Thread Howard, Lee
On 5/9/16, 2:15 PM, "DNSOP on behalf of 神明達哉" wrote: >At Fri, 6 May 2016 14:59:12 -0400, >Ted Lemon wrote: > >> > While a reverse mapping is generally useful for informational >> > purposes, some people use it even more aggressively, such as for >> > access control or host validation

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns

2016-05-12 Thread Howard, Lee
On 5/10/16 9:49 PM, "DNSOP on behalf of Mark Andrews" wrote: > >In message <20160510160757.13221.qm...@ary.lan>, "John Levine" writes: >> >Administrators should consider whether the lack of user-specified >> >hostnames is a drawback. >> > >> >This is not true - it would be trivial to al