On 5/3/16, 5:00 AM, "Stephane Bortzmeyer" <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote:

>On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 08:59:45PM +0000,
> Howard, Lee <lee.how...@twcable.com> wrote
> a message of 289 lines which said:
>
>> Having forward and reverse match isn't BCP (Stephane Bortzmeyer, and
>> others)
>
>No, that was not my point. My point was that having a PTR isn't
>BCP. _If_ there is a PTR, it's certainly better if the A/AAAA and the
>PTR match.


Ah, thank you for clarifying.
I think there are a few people who think that having a PTR is a BCP. Not a 
majority, but I'm not sure it's "in the rough" of consensus. Would it be 
sufficient for me to say it's "debatable"?


OLD:
   Best practice is that "Every Internet-reachable host should have a
   name" [RFC1912] that is recorded with a PTR resource record in the
   .ARPA zone, and "PTR's should use official names and not aliases"
   [RFC1033].  Some network services perform a PTR lookup on the source
   address of incoming packets before performing services.

NEW:
   RFC 1912 recommended that "every internet-reachable host should have a name" 
and says "Failure to have matching PTR and A records can cause loss of Internet 
services similar to not being registered in the DNS at all."   While the need 
for a PTR record and for it to match is debatable as a best practice, some 
network services still do perform a PTR lookip on the source address of 
incoming connections and verify that the PTR and A records match before 
providing service.

I could also link to the "Five common uses for PTR lookups" in the 
"Considerations and Recommendations" section.

Lee





________________________________

This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable 
proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to 
copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for 
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any 
dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the 
contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be 
unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender 
immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and 
any printout.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to