[DNSOP] Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-generalized-notify

2025-01-10 Thread Kazunori Fujiwara
> From: Matthijs Mekking > I would use city.ise.mie.example instead, unless you have confirmation > that JPRS is fine with using .jp as an example here. JP domain names have second-level, third-level, and fourth-level delegations, but are provided through a single jp zone. The structure of jp dom

[DNSOP] Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-generalized-notify

2025-01-10 Thread Matthijs Mekking
Okay, that sounds like confirmation to me. All good then! On 10-01-2025 11:29, Kazunori Fujiwara wrote: From: Matthijs Mekking I would use city.ise.mie.example instead, unless you have confirmation that JPRS is fine with using .jp as an example here. JP domain names have second-level, third-l

[DNSOP] Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-generalized-notify

2025-01-10 Thread Matthijs Mekking
Hi Peter, On 09-01-2025 21:31, Peter Thomassen wrote: Hi Matthijs, Thank you for your helpful review! Please find some responses below: On 1/9/25 14:09, Matthijs Mekking wrote: Section 3 - "There MUST NOT be more than one DSYNC record for each combination of rrtype and scheme." I w