> From: Matthijs Mekking <matth...@pletterpet.nl> > I would use city.ise.mie.example instead, unless you have confirmation > that JPRS is fine with using .jp as an example here.
JP domain names have second-level, third-level, and fourth-level delegations, but are provided through a single jp zone. The structure of jp domain names is also published in the public suffix list. Personally, I think it's okay to write down domain names that are known to exist, as they are public information, and since they are written in the draft, I don't think the impact would be much different if they were written in the RFC. What concerns me is that Ise City is not a very large local government, and I don't think that being listed in the RFC will result in storange quiries, but there may be people who are concerned about it. These area third-level examples, but I think "jprs.co.jp" or "wide.ad.jp" would be able to handle any issues. # Other ccTLDs also have fourth-level delegations. # For example: cnri.reston.va.us -- Kazunori Fujiwara, JPRS <fujiw...@jprs.co.jp> _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
