[DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Request: Review changes - draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis-03 → 04.

2024-08-29 Thread Paul Hoffman
On Aug 27, 2024, at 16:46, Warren Kumari wrote: > > Thank you very much for your comments. We've had some discussions, and the > authors will be publishing a new version in the next few days addressing > these. As you can see, we have turned in -05. We think this deals with the comments from

[DNSOP] Re: Mail regarding draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https

2024-08-29 Thread Ikwuegbu Callistus
Hi ___ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org

[DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Request: Review changes - draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis-03 → 04.

2024-08-29 Thread Michael StJohns
On 8/29/2024 4:24 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: On Aug 27, 2024, at 16:46, Warren Kumari wrote: Thank you very much for your comments. We've had some discussions, and the authors will be publishing a new version in the next few days addressing these. As you can see, we have turned in -05. We think

[DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Request: Review changes - draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis-03 → 04.

2024-08-29 Thread Warren Kumari
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 6:21 PM, Michael StJohns wrote: > On 8/29/2024 4:24 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > > On Aug 27, 2024, at 16:46, Warren Kumari > wrote: > > Thank you very much for your comments. We've had some discussions, and the > authors will be publishing a new version in the next few d

[DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Request: Review changes - draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis-03 → 04.

2024-08-29 Thread Michael StJohns
On 8/29/2024 9:14 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: Yes, I might *personally* decide to use the IANA TA after the validUntil if they haven't published a new one. If I did, that would be entirely my own (bad) decision, and I'm clearly doing something unsupported… just like if I happen to eat a can of bea