On Aug 27, 2024, at 16:46, Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> wrote: > > Thank you very much for your comments. We've had some discussions, and the > authors will be publishing a new version in the next few days addressing > these.
As you can see, we have turned in -05. We think this deals with the comments from Petr and Mike. In the diff, you can see that we moved all things that said what a relying party who accepts the trust anchor file MUST/SHOULD do to the Security Considerations; this puts them in one place and gives the context for them. We also added some text about how to do the comparison for the two fields (referring to the specific part of RFC 4034 that they need). Given that this is still in your (Warren's) two hands, not the WG's many hands, let us know if you need any more changes before the assigned telegchat. --Paul Hoffman (for the authors) _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
