I think this document is ready for publication with some nits.
Section 1.1
I like the "assumed and not derived" notion for a "trust anchor", but it's
tricky and bears a bit more explanation. Rather than repeating it in the
following sentence, perhaps you could say "the decision to trust this e
Hi Davey,
To clarify, the "DNS Load Balancing" side meeting will not be concerned
primarily with nameserver selection. Instead, the topic of the side meeting
will be about using DNS to perform load balancing of other services and
protocols.
I think this draft's term ("Nameserver Selection") i
Yes, I concur with this distinction Ben, and also that both these topics
deserve discussion.
Shumon.
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 11:20 AM Ben Schwartz wrote:
> Hi Davey,
>
> To clarify, the "DNS Load Balancing" side meeting will not be concerned
> primarily with nameserver selection. Instead, the t
(no hats)
I concur with the concurs of the topic distinction.
Thanks Davey and Shumon for reading something to read later!
tim
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 11:30 AM Shumon Huque wrote:
> Yes, I concur with this distinction Ben, and also that both these topics
> deserve discussion.
>
> Shumon.
>
>
All
The Working Group Last Call has been completed
for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis. The chairs are in agreement that there is
consensus to move this forward.
We will mark it as such in the Datatracker.
We have chatted with the authors, and they are going to address all
comments and are "highly c
On 7/3/24 17:19, Ben Schwartz wrote:
Hi Davey,
To clarify, the "DNS Load Balancing" side meeting will not be concerned
primarily with nameserver selection. Instead, the topic of the side meeting will be
about using DNS to perform load balancing of other services and protocols.
I think this
On Jul 3, 2024, at 09:32, Peter Thomassen wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/3/24 17:19, Ben Schwartz wrote:
>> Hi Davey,
>> To clarify, the "DNS Load Balancing" side meeting will not be concerned
>> primarily with nameserver selection. Instead, the topic of the side meeting
>> will be about using DNS to p
Agree with Paul. There is also "Load Balancing DNS Services" which is more
of a L4 network situation, which I have witnessed (and still do) in
enterprise networks.
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 12:38 PM Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Jul 3, 2024, at 09:32, Peter Thomassen wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/3/24
Hi Roman,
I wanted to let you know that we’ve incorporated these changes into the
document, even though they weren’t reflected in the -09 version that was posted
just the other day.
DW
> On Jun 18, 2024, at 11:57 AM, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
I appreciate the reminder. It's best not to mix them. I've requested a
timeslot for NS selection in the DNSOP session at IETF120.
Davey
On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 11:19 PM Ben Schwartz wrote:
> Hi Davey,
>
> To clarify, the "DNS Load Balancing" side meeting will not be concerned
> primarily with na
Reviewer: Nicolai Leymann
Review result: Ready
I am the designated DNS Directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion.
This is the third review I am doing - in my last review on the -08 version I
came to the conclusion that the document is ready for publication.
The draft is going to be
11 matches
Mail list logo
