"If one or more authoritative servers designated by the delegating NS rrset or
by the apex NS rrset answers non-authoritatively for a zone, that zone is said
to have a lame delegation."
p vixie
On Apr 9, 2023 04:13, Paul Hoffman wrote:
I have been on vacation this week and am just seeing
Reviewer: Niclas Comstedt
Review result: Ready
I have been tasked to review this document on behalf of the OPS directorate.
This document reserves a TLD label, 'alt', as a pseudo-TLD to be used in non-DNS
contexts.
Thanks for a clear and well written document. Given the purpose I do not have
any
“If none of the name servers in the delegating NS RRset responds with an
authoritative answer for the zone delegated then that zone has a lame
delegation. If a name server cannot be resolved into an IP address or cannot be
reached of UDP port 53 then that is, for this definition, equal to not re
<>
I know the dev who coined the term and I know what it meant. If that term is
not now useful to you feel free to make up one of your own rather than
redefining this one to suit changing tastes.
p vixie
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https:
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
