Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work put into this document and for redoing it with ECH. Important piece of work as it is related to some ADD documents as well. Please find below some non-blocking COMMENT points (but replies would be appreciated even if only for my own education), and some nits. Special thanks to Tim Wicinski for the shepherd's write-up including the detailed section about the WG consensus even if I regret the absence of intended status justification. I hope that this helps to improve the document, Regards, -éric COMMENTS Slight regret that some of my -08 comments were not addressed (e.g., expanding HSTS) even if most of them were indeed addressed. I also wonder about the amount of ECH-related content in this revised I-D while the whole goal of the exercise was to disconnect from ECH. E.g., in section 1.1 there is a *new* " Enable the conveyance of Encrypted ClientHello [ECH] keys associated with an alternative endpoint." BTW, I like the addition of DNS64 in the document. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
