Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please r
Hi Robert,
Thanks for your review.
On 1/5/23 13:22, Robert Wilton via Datatracker wrote:
Minor level comments:
(1) p 2, sec 2. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPT
On Thu, 5 Jan 2023, zhangcuiling wrote:
Dear dnsop,
According to the comment, I modified the draft. There are two major changes.
1. Modify the description of SM3 DS records ( Section 2 )
In section 2, the length of digest is listed as a difference between SHA-256
and SM3,
but in reality the l
(chairs hat on)
Paul is correct.
Also, I feel we ("we" being the chairs + Overlord Warren + IESG folks)
should write some nice simple text to explain this
to authors in the future.
tim
On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 1:42 PM Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2023, zhangcuiling wrote:
>
> > Dear dnso
I support publication of this draft.
Since it has no keywords in it, Section 1.1 should be deleted.
Thanks,
Donald
===
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
d3e...@gmail.com
>
> *From: *DNSOP on behalf of Suza
I'd like to learn about ISE first.
Thanks a lot for your advice.
Best regards,
Cathy
> > Dear dnsop,
> >
> > According to the comment, I modified the draft. There are two major changes.
> >
> > 1. Modify the description of SM3 DS records ( Section 2 )
> > In section 2, the length of digest is l
