Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, Thanks for this document. I'm not an expert on DNS, and hence found it slightly harder to read. Minor level comments: (1) p 2, sec 2. Terminology The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119][RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. Is there a reference to generic DNS terminology that could be imported here. This may aid readers less familiar with DNS. Nit level comments: (2) p 12, sec 6. Implementation and operational Notes For example if the catalog is generated by some script and this script for whatever reason generates an empty catalog, millions of member zones may get deleted from their secondaries within seconds and all the affected domains may be offline in a blink. Minor bit, but I would expect the phrase to be "in a blink of an eye". Regards, Rob _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
