Re: [DNSOP] Is DNSSEC a Best Current Practice?

I have been thinking the same thing this evening about 1034 and 1035. Thanks for bringing it up. They do not need to have BCP status, but for several years now I have felt those two need to be republished with all the updated text from the many updates (28 for 1035, 18 for 1034) in new documents.

Re: [DNSOP] Is DNSSEC a Best Current Practice?

Tim Wicinski wrote on 2022-03-11 01:38: ... for several years now I have felt those two need to be republished with all the updated text from the many updates (28 for 1035, 18 for 1034) in new documents.  This does not include any other changes, and it feels like a thankless task. not just th

Re: [DNSOP] Is DNSSEC a Best Current Practice?

On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 01:49:41AM -0800, Paul Vixie wrote: > Tim Wicinski wrote on 2022-03-11 01:38: > > ... for several years now I have > > felt those two need to be republished with all > > the updated text from the many updates (28 for 1035, 18 for 1034) in new > > documents.  This does not in

Re: [DNSOP] Is DNSSEC a Best Current Practice?

On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 4:49 AM Paul Vixie wrote: > > > Tim Wicinski wrote on 2022-03-11 01:38: > > ... for several years now I have > > felt those two need to be republished with all > > the updated text from the many updates (28 for 1035, 18 for 1034) in new > > documents. This does not includ

Re: [DNSOP] Is DNSSEC a Best Current Practice?

Tim Wicinski wrote: I have been thinking the same thing this evening about 1034 and 1035. Thanks for bringing it up. They do not need to have BCP status, but for several years now I have felt those two need to be republished with all the updated text from the many updates (28 for 1035, 18 for 1

[DNSOP] FW: [Maprg] Draft agenda for IETF-113 uploaded

Hi DNS community, in MAPRG we will have talks about DNS over TCP as well as over QUIC and a talk on DNSSEC which might be of interest for you (see below)! Would be great to see you all in MAPRG! Mirja On 11.03.22, 18:54, "Maprg on behalf of Mirja Kuehlewind" wrote: Hi all, we u

Re: [DNSOP] Is DNSSEC a Best Current Practice?

On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 06:54:07PM +, Paul Hoffman wrote: > Greetings again. My motivation here is kinda trivial, but I've heard > it is a common complaint. When writing a about DNSSEC, I need to > reference the RFC. But it's three RFCs (4033, 4034, and 4035), and > possibly another (6840). It