I have been thinking the same thing this evening about 1034 and 1035. Thanks for bringing it up.
They do not need to have BCP status, but for several years now I have felt those two need to be republished with all the updated text from the many updates (28 for 1035, 18 for 1034) in new documents. This does not include any other changes, and it feels like a thankless task. tim On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:45 PM Yasuhiro Orange Morishita / 森下泰宏 < yasuh...@jprs.co.jp> wrote: > Paul-san, > > > In the big picture, I think it would be good for the DNS to be able > > to refer to DNSSEC more easily. Thoughts? > > I think it can be said for RFC 1034 and 1035, too. > But it's much more difficult than DNSSEC. > > My friend Takashi Takizawa maintains this horrible figure. > > DNS RFCs - ttkzw's site > <https://emaillab.jp/dns/dns-rfc/> > > -- Orange > > -- > Yasuhiro 'Orange' Morishita <yasuh...@jprs.co.jp> > > From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org> > Subject: [DNSOP] Is DNSSEC a Best Current Practice? > Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 18:54:07 +0000 > > > Greetings again. My motivation here is kinda trivial, but I've heard it > is a common complaint. When writing a about DNSSEC, I need to reference the > RFC. But it's three RFCs (4033, 4034, and 4035), and possibly another > (6840). It would be awfully nice to refer to "DNSSEC" with a single > reference like "BCP 250". > > > > To get there, we need to update the RFCs and say that we want an BCP. > This is mostly a paperwork exercise, but this WG isn't terribly good at > getting those done. Maybe we could create a short-lived WG for moving > DNSSEC to BCP that just the DNSSEC-y people need to pay attention to. If we > do it, that WG would not take up any new DNSSEC-related work, just spruce > up the base RFCs. > > > > In the big picture, I think it would be good for the DNS to be able to > refer to DNSSEC more easily. Thoughts? > > > > --Paul Hoffman > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
