Re: [DNSOP] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl-04: (with COMMENT)

2021-05-20 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 12:28 +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote: > Hello Benjamin, > > On Tue, 2021-05-18 at 20:36 -0700, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker > wrote: > > I don't think I understand what a "deviating value" would be (and in > > which direction it would deviate). > > This sentence was added bec

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-05.txt

2021-05-20 Thread Ralf Weber
Moin! On 20 May 2021, at 3:32, Brian Dickson wrote: > (There's a reason I'm not suggesting making SVCB non-extensible, or > touching any aspect of the SVCB thing itself.) > > Note that more ALPN values are supported, and how those are > defined/used/etc are really not relevant to the structure (wi

[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl-05.txt

2021-05-20 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF. Title : NSEC and NSEC3 TTLs and NSEC Aggressive Use Author : Peter van Dijk Filename:

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl-05.txt

2021-05-20 Thread Peter van Dijk
Hello DNSOP and IESG, I believe I have handled all review comments from the IESG, resulting in the version below. Changes from draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl-04 to draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl- 05: * various minor rewordings (from IESG review, and things I spotted while handling IESG review comments) *

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-05.txt

2021-05-20 Thread Ralf Weber
Moin! On 20 May 2021, at 19:59, Eric Orth wrote: > A big selling point behind why we have client implementers planning to > query HTTPS records is the expectation that this will be the only query > type we will need to add and that it can be extended to handle any future > information we need for

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-05.txt

2021-05-20 Thread Dick Franks
On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 03:57, Mark Andrews wrote: >8 > > > > > RFC1035 has the definition of encoding: > > A bunch of characters without any internal spaces, or > > A string beginning with " and ending with ", and anything else in between > > except " which must be escaped. > > Which doesn’t wor