Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update-07: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
One thing I have been pondering is multi-target aliases. (But I haven't
posted about it here because I don't think the suggestion will get very
far!) Multi-aliases would be useful in some situations when I would like
to be able to model systems at a higher level, for things like
mx.cam.ac.uk which
Howdy. I've posted a draft that might be of interest to folk in this
group.
It's best venue is almost certainly the dbound mailing list, where it is
already starting to get discussion (and cross-posted to the dmarc list.)
Discussing it here, on a third list, doesn't seem advisable, but it's
i had to think about this for quite a long time. i've trimmed the cc
headers.
Christian Huitema wrote on 2019-03-12 20:39:
On 3/12/2019 7:56 PM, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
...
The mirror image of that statement is, "when did intermediaries get
a mandate to filter content?"
it was rarely a man
Paul, it might be worth asking whether you believe that isps should be
selling eyeballs. If you think they should, then your argument makes sense.
It’s the same argument isps give for charging me for service and then
charging Netflix for access to me.
If you don’t agree with this model, then your
In article <03202426-5fa7-de6a-688d-491bde740...@dcrocker.net> you write:
>Howdy. I've posted a draft that might be of interest to folk in this
>group.
>
>It's best venue is almost certainly the dbound mailing list, where it is
>already starting to get discussion (and cross-posted to the dmarc li
