In article <03202426-5fa7-de6a-688d-491bde740...@dcrocker.net> you write: >Howdy. I've posted a draft that might be of interest to folk in this >group. > >It's best venue is almost certainly the dbound mailing list, where it is >already starting to get discussion (and cross-posted to the dmarc list.) > >Discussing it here, on a third list, doesn't seem advisable, but it's >already been noted on the dbound discussion that the draft raises issues >that might be of concern to the dnsop community.
The part of interest to DNSOP would be section 7 on pages 12 and 13 where it discusses tree walks and potential new additional section processing to find the closest perimeter record above a name being checked. Other than that it's just another TXT record with a _prefix name. R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
