[DNSOP] Announcement of ICANN DNS Symposium

2017-02-02 Thread Matt Larson
(This email is sent from my personal account because that's how I'm subscribed, and I apologize if you receive multiple copies.) Dear colleagues, I'd like to invite you to the first-ever ICANN DNS Symposium, which will be held in Madrid, Spain, on Saturday, 13 May 2017. ICANN's Office of the C

[DNSOP] virtual interim DNSOP WG meeting and current status, special use names

2017-02-02 Thread Suzanne Woolf
Hi, We’ve been behind the curve because one of us (Suzanne) has been ill, but here’s where we are, including time/date for the virtual interim we’re planning: 1. There’s a new revision of the special use names problem statement, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/

Re: [DNSOP] ALT-TLD and (insecure) delgations.

2017-02-02 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 03:28:29PM -0500, Warren Kumari wrote a message of 103 lines which said: > or 2: request that the IANA insert an insecure delegation in the > root, pointing to a: AS112 or b: an empty zone on the root or c" > something similar. Here, people may be interested by draft-b

[DNSOP] correction Re: virtual interim DNSOP WG meeting and current status, special use names

2017-02-02 Thread Suzanne Woolf
And because it’s been that day…. Thanks for the off-list nudge, that’s ***Thursday 16 February*** for most of the world, Friday 17 February for the AP region. We’ve blocked two hours for the meeting. Apologies for the error. Suzanne > On Feb 2, 2017, at 3:52 PM, Suzanne Woolf wrote: > 3. W

[DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps

2017-02-02 Thread Suzanne Woolf
This message opens a Working Group Last Call for: "Special-Use Names Problem Statement" https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/ Proposed status: informational Starts: 2 Feb. 2017 Ends: 23 Feb. 2017 (3 weeks) Discu

Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps

2017-02-02 Thread John Levine
>If not, can you suggest changes that would get your support for advancing it? >(“Send text” if possible!) It's closer than I had remembered. In the problem paragraph that starts at the bottom of page 6, on domain names that have been commandeered, I'd like it to say that there is no agreement o