Hi, We’ve been behind the curve because one of us (Suzanne) has been ill, but here’s where we are, including time/date for the virtual interim we’re planning:
1. There’s a new revision of the special use names problem statement, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/> Please review, particularly if you haven’t looked at it recently or had new concerns raised by the discussion in Seoul and on the list about the HOMENET WG. We’re starting Working Group Last Call on it (see next message for the formal kickoff). 2. The alt-tld draft has been revised in view of the discussion in homenet about DNSSEC resolution and DNS protocol for local names under .homenet. That too has been posted and Warren has kicked off a discussion here ("Subject: ALT-TLD and (insecure) delgations.") about how to handle that issue: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/> 3. We still want (and have time) to do a virtual interim WG meeting before Chicago. We’ve picked a date: Thursday 17 February, 19:00 UTC, which is: 19:00 UTC 20:00 CEST (Frankfurt, Stockholm) 14:00 EST (North American Eastern) 11:00 PST (North American Western) 06:00 AEDT (Sydney, Melbourne) (Webex details will follow) As usual, scheduling isn’t perfect for anyone but we tried to cover the largest possible area of the globe adequately. Preliminary agenda for the meeting is: 1. Issues from WGLC on the problem statement (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/>) 2. Proposals for moving forward: * reviews of alt-tld; ready for WGLC? will it help? (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/>) * stop here? (leave RFC 6761 as-is, continue to process registry changes case-by-case) * proposals for process revision/update? 3. Next steps: * any drafts to write? * any input or liaison to request from the IAB? (regarding either namespace architecture or relationships of the IETF with other groups) 4. AOB: your I-D or proposed action for the WG/IESG/IAB here thanks, Suzanne & Tim
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
