A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the IETF.
Title : NXDOMAIN really means there is nothing underneath
Authors : Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 08:26:09AM -0700,
internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote
a message of 47 lines which said:
> Title : NXDOMAIN really means there is nothing underneath
> Authors : Stephane Bortzmeyer
> Shumon Huque
> Filename
On 12-Sep-16 16:19, Suzanne Woolf wrote:
> It seems unlikely that they can be combined, so we simply have to ask
> the WG to choose.
I do not understand this point. Having now read both IDs, I see
relevant points for the ongoing discussion in both of them. I see them
as complementary where bo
>On 12-Sep-16 16:19, Suzanne Woolf wrote:
>> It seems unlikely that they can be combined, so we simply have to ask
>> the WG to choose.
The more I think about it, the more I think that they're both too
long, and we'd be better off with a one or two sentence description of
what we're trying to do,
On 18 Sep 2016, at 14:10, John Levine wrote:
4.2.4. Name Collision in the DNS ...
This study is from before the new gTLD program. The assumption in
the
report need to be tested against what actually happened in the round
of
new gTLDs before it can be included as part of the fact basis for
It is impossible to measure the effectiveness without knowing how many
collision queries are just noise (queries that will cause no noticeable
damage if they started coming back with results).
Agreed. I don't see how to find that out in ways that are not hard to
back out if it turns out the d
Avri, thanks for the markups--I will take care of the ones that are
actionable, and respond in a separate message, because I want to address
the question of merging explicitly, along with John's comment about brevity.
Why not merge the two documents? This sounds reasonable on the surface,
but ple
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the IETF.
Title : A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure
To Respond.
Author : M. Andrews
F
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the IETF.
Title : A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure
To Respond.
Author : M. Andrews
F
>To John's point, short isn't actually good, because it's important to
>document the context--
No, really, short is essential. I'm happy to add the context once we
have a concise statement of what the problem is.
> But we tried to keep the actual
>problem statement short and pithy; if you really
Dealing with toxic waste names is out of scope for the problem statement.
The problem of toxic waste names is mentioned in the tldr problem statement
as a problem, which could potentially be dealt with if the working group
decides it's in scope. That's why the document is written the way it is.
Dealing with toxic waste names is out of scope for the problem statement.
Well, that's one theory. Let's see of other people agree.
R's,
John
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
There is actually a fifth type of name, escaped names. Right now, the only
names we have of this type are SRV protocol tags, (_http._tcp.example.com) and
internationalized names (xn—wev.com)
I want to add a third set of escaped names, one that has similar functionality
to .onion but does not le
There is actually a fifth type of name, escaped names. Right now, the only
names we have of this type are SRV protocol tags, (_http._tcp.example.com)
and internationalized names (xn—wev.com)
I want to add a third set of escaped names, one that has similar
functionality to .onion but does not leak
Okay, this is an interesting application that would certainly require some
sort of 6761-style action. Do you believe that it is not covered by the
current problem statement?
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Phill wrote:
> There is actually a fifth type of name, escaped names. Right now, the on
On 18 Sep 2016, at 15:21, John R Levine wrote:
It is impossible to measure the effectiveness without knowing how
many collision queries are just noise (queries that will cause no
noticeable damage if they started coming back with results).
Agreed. I don't see how to find that out in ways tha
This is an instance of embedding. {th...@example.com}.{non-DNS-part}
is not subject to special delegation rules in some sense, because the
test of {non-DNS-part} requires no DNS action. If its synonymous with
_special_label_.{non-DNS-part}.{example.com} then its about a
conversation with upper syst
17 matches
Mail list logo
