>To John's point, short isn't actually good, because it's important to >document the context--
No, really, short is essential. I'm happy to add the context once we have a concise statement of what the problem is. > But we tried to keep the actual >problem statement short and pithy; if you really think it's too long, >perhaps you could suggest shorter wordings that still capture the actual >problems. Ah. See previous message for some examples. In neither of the documents can I tell whether dealing with the toxic waste names is supposed to be in or out of scope. R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
