In your letter dated Tue, 6 Sep 2016 06:26:58 + you wrote:
> I was more commenting on the fact that it is escaping in a format
> that already support escaping. The JSON output would be double
> escaped and implementations would need to unescape it themselves
> rather then let JSON handle it.
J
In your letter dated Mon, 5 Sep 2016 15:47:37 +0800 you wrote:
>Finally, I note that the RIPE Atlas system uses a type of DNS JSON
>representation when you use their API to query for DNS measurement
>results. You can get a sample here:
>
>https://atlas.ripe.net/api/v2/measurements/5009360/results?s
Shane Kerr wrote:
> At 2016-09-05 11:22:48 +0100
> Tony Finch wrote:
> > Shane Kerr wrote:
> > >
> > > It occurs to me that maybe we want an option to have arrays of RRset
> > > instead of arrays of RRs?
> >
> > If you do that, how do you represent the covering signature(s)?
>
> I'm not sure I u
If you want to do that, you could probably piggyback it on my recently
revived draft-levine-dnsextlang.
Interesting. I vaguely remember someone (Olafur?) also had a similar
approach to dynamically describing RTYPE in the DNS itself. Or maybe
it was actually this draft that I am thinking of?
Th
John R Levine wrote:
>
> That's the eventual plan, although there is a long tail of funky field types
> found only in RRs that nobody uses any more.
When I looked at this in 2012 I concluded that the best approach would be
to keep the generic language REALLY simple, and that RDATA with special
ne
When I looked at this in 2012 I concluded that the best approach would be
to keep the generic language REALLY simple, and that RDATA with special
needs would have to have a custom-coded parser/serializer.
I'm close to that. If a field is odd but it's a minor variant of
something else, such as
John R Levine wrote:
>
> I'm close to that. If a field is odd but it's a minor variant of something
> else, such as the hex fields with optional hyphens or dots, it's easy enough
> to include. Or if it seems like it might be useful in the future, like a
> trailing list of domain names which coul