Shane Kerr <sh...@time-travellers.org> wrote: > At 2016-09-05 11:22:48 +0100 > Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at> wrote: > > Shane Kerr <sh...@time-travellers.org> wrote: > > > > > > It occurs to me that maybe we want an option to have arrays of RRset > > > instead of arrays of RRs? > > > > If you do that, how do you represent the covering signature(s)? > > I'm not sure I understand the question? An RRSIG is for an entire > RRset, so either one could add the signature to the RRset object or > leave them as separate RR.
Well, yes, that's the question :-) And if you make them part of the RRset object, how do you do so? and if they aren't part of the RRset object then you have to have a special way to separate RRSIGs based on their type-covered field. etc. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ - I xn--zr8h punycode Plymouth, North Biscay: Variable 3 or 4, becoming easterly or southeasterly 4 or 5 later. Moderate, occasionally slight. Fog patches. Moderate, occasionally very poor. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
