Re: [DNSOP] Definitions of basic DNSSEC terms

2016-08-09 Thread Edward Lewis
On 8/4/16, 10:16, "DNSOP on behalf of Paul Hoffman" wrote: Greetings again. There are six terms that are commonly used when we talk about DNSSEC: - validation and validate - authentication and authenticate - verification and verify Are they defined in any RFCs that

Re: [DNSOP] Definitions of basic DNSSEC terms

2016-08-09 Thread Tony Finch
> Greetings again. There are six terms that are commonly used when we talk > about DNSSEC: > - validation and validate > - authentication and authenticate > - verification and verify > Are they defined in any RFCs that we can use for the terminology-bis > document?

Re: [DNSOP] Possible issues with DNS over HTTP wire format draft

2016-08-09 Thread Sara Dickinson
> On 8 Aug 2016, at 14:41, Shane Kerr wrote: > > Hello, > > As for a requirement for TLS... the document currently says that > implementers SHOULD use TLS. My own feeling is that this should be > enough; apparently the recommendation to require TLS was made in the > HTTP/2 working group and rej

Re: [DNSOP] [apps-discuss] Draft of interest in DNSOP: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf

2016-08-09 Thread Patrik Fältström
On 4 Aug 2016, at 18:55, Dave Crocker wrote: >>> For URI records RFC 7553 says they're either named the same as SRV >>> records, or they use enumservice names from the Enumservice >> >> Declaring a namespace as the union of two, independently-maintained >> registries is a very efficient way to enc

Re: [DNSOP] Possible issues with DNS over HTTP wire format draft

2016-08-09 Thread Marek Vavruša
Hi, On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 6:41 AM, Shane Kerr wrote: > Hello, > > There are a few suggestions about the DNS over HTTP draft made off-list, > which I will try to characterize here: > > * We should expand the motivations to explain why DNS over HTTP makes > sense at all. > > * We should restrict

Re: [DNSOP] Definitions of basic DNSSEC terms

2016-08-09 Thread william manning
must be mass hallucination. My memory concurs with Ed on the history. If you MUST define authentication, validation, and verification, I would place them under, "local policy" /W On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Edward Lewis wrote: > On 8/4/16, 10:16, "DNSOP on behalf of Paul Hoffman" < > dnso

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming

2016-08-09 Thread william manning
re the 2 second timeout. perhaps timeout does not express the intent well. I think of most of the DNS timeout options to be effectively hold-down timers - to be used to prevent excessive "chatty" behaviours. /W On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Shane Kerr wrote: > All, > > At 2016-08-04 20:03:3

[DNSOP] dnsop - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 96

2016-08-09 Thread "IETF Meeting Session Request Tool"
A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Stephanie McCammon, on behalf of the dnsop working group. - Working Group Name: Domain Name System Operations Area Name: Operations and Management Area Session Requester: Stephanie