Last week, Kato and I submitted -03 version of
draft-fujiwara-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse draft. It improved the
structure of the document for readability and made minor corrections
but essential idea has not been changed.
We are appreciated if you read and commet it.
Regards,
--
Kazunori Fujiwara,
Fujiwara,
At 2016-03-24 18:01:46 +0900
fujiw...@jprs.co.jp wrote:
> Last week, Kato and I submitted -03 version of
> draft-fujiwara-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse draft. It improved the
> structure of the document for readability and made minor corrections
> but essential idea has not been changed.
Th
Andrew,
At 2016-03-23 09:11:44 -0400
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 06:55:00PM -0700, Paul Vixie wrote:
> > i think we have to start planning for a world in which EDNS0 never reaches
> > 75% penetration due to middleboxes having the high ground.
>
> Well, you could get most
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7816,
"DNS Query Name Minimisation to Improve Privacy".
--
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7816&eid=4644
--
Type: T
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 09:16:17AM -0700,
RFC Errata System wrote
a message of 70 lines which said:
> Changed ".example" to ".example.com".
Correct (two occurrences). Sorry for the bug.
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mai
Greetings. The authors have done a great job of cleaning up the document
since the -01, but there are still many open issues. It would be grand
if we could use the mailing list to discuss this before the face-to-face
meeting in under two weeks.
Below are the issues I brought up on the -01 docu
