Fujiwara,

At 2016-03-24 18:01:46 +0900
fujiw...@jprs.co.jp wrote:

> Last week, Kato and I submitted -03 version of
> draft-fujiwara-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse draft. It improved the
> structure of the document for readability and made minor corrections
> but essential idea has not been changed.

Thank you for this work. I hope that it goes forward.

The latest draft seems to have spent a lot of time covering NSEC3 more
clearly.

My main question is... are there any missing pieces that you know of? It
seems pretty complete to me, although I have not implemented it so I
can't really say.

If there are not missing pieces, are there controversial parts?

Cheers,

--
Shane

Attachment: pgpvY9sJqpO7w.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to