Hi, folks,
I posted a draft few days ago.
Comments are welcome.
Declan Ma
ZDNS Ltd.
> 下面是被转发的邮件：
>
> 发件人: internet-dra...@ietf.org
> 收件人: Linjian Song , Di Ma , "Feng Han"
> , "Di Ma" , "Davey Song"
> , Feng Han
> 主题: New Version Notification for draft-madi-dnsop-drzom-0
IANA review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed
ID Tracker URL:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-key-timing/
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
Placed on agenda for telechat - 2014-12-18
ID Tracker URL:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-key-timing/
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
神明達哉 writes:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:52 PM, wrote:
>>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working
>> Group of the IETF.
>>
>> Title : Child To Parent Sync
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'AS112 Redirection using DNAME'
(draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-dname-06.txt) as Informational RFC
This document is the product of the Domain Name System Operations Working
Group.
The IESG contact persons are Joel Jaeggli and Benoit Claise.
A URL of this
Hi all,
A reminder that, if you are coming to the "Workshop on DNS Future Root
Service Architecture, Hong Kong, December 8-9, 2014" meeting to please
let Paul Vixie or myself Warren Kumari
know.
We have a room block at venue hotel. To reserve a room in this block,
visit the URL shown below:
htt
神明達哉 writes:
> From a quick check some of them still seem to be open. And, as far as
> I remember there has been no response to my comments, so I'm not sure
> if they were considered/discussed but dismissed or simply overlooked.
First, apologies again for missing these comments during last call
> On Dec 1, 2014, at 4:31 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
>
> 神明達哉 writes:
>
>> From a quick check some of them still seem to be open. And, as far as
>> I remember there has been no response to my comments, so I'm not sure
>> if they were considered/discussed but dismissed or simply overlooked.
>
>
