So, clearly we are not going to be having an interim on the week of
January 30th. For those trying to follow along at home, I heard
(off-list, through a 3rd party) that the interim is supposed to be
virtual. That means that it only needs one week notice, but we've
missed that deadline as well.
The
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Ralph Droms wrote:
>
>> On Jan 13, 2017, at 9:47 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:41 PM Suzanne Woolf wrote:
>> Dear Colleagues,
>>
>>
>> It's time to get back to our work on special use names. As the chairs see
>> it, here's what w
I think updating alt-tld draft to point to the specific problems in
sutld-ps to be useful.
I am holding out hope that alt-tld will be unstuck and kicked down the road.
I also am holding out for a pony.
tim
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Ralph Droms wrote:
>
> > On Jan 13, 2017, at 9:47 PM, W
> On Jan 13, 2017, at 9:47 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:41 PM Suzanne Woolf wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
>
>
> It's time to get back to our work on special use names. As the chairs see it,
> here's what we need to do between now and IETF 98 (end of March). We'll
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:47 PM Warren Kumari wrote:
>
>> ...
>>
>> We have had a proposal, for the ALT TLD, before us for some time now,
>> which we put aside while we worked on the problem statement. As part of
>> assessing solutions, w
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:47 PM Warren Kumari wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:41 PM Suzanne Woolf
> wrote:
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
>
> It's time to get back to our work on special use names. As the chairs see
> it, here's what we need to do between now and IETF 98 (end of March).
> We'll be ha
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:41 PM Suzanne Woolf
wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
>
>
> It's time to get back to our work on special use names. As the chairs see
> it, here's what we need to do between now and IETF 98 (end of March).
> We'll be having a DNSOP WG interim meeting shortly, see below.
>
> 1. W