-dnsop-alt-...@ietf.org; dnsop-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld next steps
Hi Joe, David, George,
My impression, from discussions with folks who know a lot more about ICANN that
I do, is that the relevant folks in ICANN are likely already aware of this
proposal, and
On 7 Mar 2023, at 18:48, Joe Abley wrote:
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 15:56, David Conrad
wrote:
4 weeks for ICANN (which? Organization, Board, Community, all 3?) to
provide feedback? (That feels sort of like the ITU asking "the IETF"
for feedback on an IP-related protocol document in 4 weeks.
: dnsop@ietf.org; draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-...@ietf.org; dnsop-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld next steps
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 15:56, David Conrad
mailto:d...@virtualized.org>> wrote:
4 weeks for ICANN (which? Organization, Board, Community, all 3?) to provide
fe
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 15:56, David Conrad wrote:
> 4 weeks for ICANN (which? Organization, Board, Community, all 3?) to provide
> feedback? (That feels sort of like the ITU asking "the IETF" for feedback on
> an IP-related protocol document in 4 weeks.)
Did the IETF (also which?) provide feed
I agree. I would be amazed if a 6 month feedback window was sufficient
to get this through the formalisms.
-G
On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 7:02 AM David Conrad wrote:
>
> Rob,
>
> 4 weeks for ICANN (which? Organization, Board, Community, all 3?) to provide
> feedback? (That feels sort of like the IT
Rob,
4 weeks for ICANN (which? Organization, Board, Community, all 3?) to provide
feedback? (That feels sort of like the ITU asking "the IETF" for feedback on
an IP-related protocol document in 4 weeks.)
As I’m sure both Harald and Warren can attest, ICANN processes, particularly
those for wh
