On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 01:02:28PM +0200, Ralf Weber wrote:
> On 05.06.2007, at 17:15, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> >Would adding a note in the Security Considerations section to the
> >following
> >effect address this issue for you:
[. . .]
> Well the intent was more to have it under 4.2 to encou
Moin!
On 05.06.2007, at 17:15, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
Would adding a note in the Security Considerations section to the
following
effect address this issue for you:
To the extent that the DNS Security Extensions make DNS results
more reliable, deployment of the DNS Security Exte
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:28:23AM +0200, Ralf Weber wrote:
> Moin!
>
> As pointed out several times throughout the draft DNSSEC deployment
> would make reverse mappings more reliable. So wouldn't it be a good
> idea to put a paragraph in the draft to encourage LIRs and providers
> to sign t
Moin!
As pointed out several times throughout the draft DNSSEC deployment
would make reverse mappings more reliable. So wouldn't it be a good
idea to put a paragraph in the draft to encourage LIRs and providers
to sign there reverse zones? Key management for reverse zone probably
isn't as
