On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 01:02:28PM +0200, Ralf Weber wrote: > On 05.06.2007, at 17:15, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > >Would adding a note in the Security Considerations section to the > >following > >effect address this issue for you:
[. . .] > Well the intent was more to have it under 4.2 to encourage LIR and > network > operators to deploy DNSSEC in reverse mapping. I'm somewhat disinclined to add it there, just because the document is about reverse mappings, and not about DNSSEC. If we have to add to every document about the DNS that people should use DNSSEC, every document is going to get longer. But I am open to persuasion: does anybody else think we should add a note encouraging DNSSEC in section 4.2? > But the notion in the > Security Considerations is also needed. Ok, I'll add that, in any case. A -- Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> M2P 2A8 jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 416 646 3304 x4110 _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
