Never mind my recommendation - the cited draft is the right form.
(But given the comments to date, it seems that the crypto-ists aren't
recommending this.)
On 12/10/15, 8:54, "Edward Lewis" wrote:
>My one recommendation is, if they want to assign this a DNSSEC security
>algorithm number, propos
I'm not on SAAG and don't have the time to add another mail list...
My one recommendation is, if they want to assign this a DNSSEC security
algorithm number, propose that in a separate draft akin to what's in RFCs
5155, 5702, 5933, 6605 - or as seen in the DNS Security Algorithm Numbers
registry a
