Never mind my recommendation - the cited draft is the right form. (But given the comments to date, it seems that the crypto-ists aren't recommending this.)
On 12/10/15, 8:54, "Edward Lewis" <edward.le...@icann.org> wrote: >My one recommendation is, if they want to assign this a DNSSEC security >algorithm number, propose that in a separate draft akin to what's in RFCs >5155, 5702, 5933, 6605...
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
