Hi Toerless,
At 10:53 AM 27-02-2024, Toerless Eckert wrote:
I don't think ICANN are the authoritative experts to define how to
best operate
private DNS zones, especially not modifications to configs if not source code
to automatically filter out DNS requests for that zone to avoid the
overload
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 6:07 AM, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> Thanks, Paul
>
> My comment:
>
> https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/
> proposed-top-level-domain-string-for-private-use-24-01-2024/submissions/
> eckert-toerless-27-02-2024 Summary of Submission:
> I would like to see a BCP
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Toerless Eckert wrote:
Me ? No.
Why do we care whether ICANN will delegate .INTERNAL? They'll never
delegate .AA or .ZZ either, and nobody sees that as a problem.
R"s,
John
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 01:22:43PM -0500, John Levine wrote:
It appears that Joe Abley said
On Feb 27, 2024, at 10:53, Toerless Eckert wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 01:48:22PM +0100, Joe Abley wrote:
>> Op 27 feb 2024 om 12:08 heeft Toerless Eckert het volgende
>> geschreven:
>>
>>> I would like to see a BCP RFC on the use of the "internal" TLD,
>>> and ICANN should no
Hi there,
Op 27 feb 2024 om 19:54 heeft Toerless Eckert het volgende
geschreven:
>> Surely what ICANN is preparing to do is make a decision that an "internal"
>> TLD should never be available.
>
> How did you come to that conclusion. It sounded to me as if ICANN
> is on the road to assign .in
Me ? No.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 01:22:43PM -0500, John Levine wrote:
> It appears that Joe Abley said:
> >Hey,
> >
> >Op 27 feb 2024 om 12:08 heeft Toerless Eckert het volgende
> >geschreven:
> >
> >> I would like to see a BCP RFC on the use of the "internal" TLD,
> >> and ICANN s
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 01:48:22PM +0100, Joe Abley wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Op 27 feb 2024 om 12:08 heeft Toerless Eckert het volgende
> geschreven:
>
> > I would like to see a BCP RFC on the use of the "internal" TLD,
> > and ICANN should not finalize availability of the TLD unless that
It appears that Joe Abley said:
>Hey,
>
>Op 27 feb 2024 om 12:08 heeft Toerless Eckert het volgende
>geschreven:
>
>> I would like to see a BCP RFC on the use of the "internal" TLD,
>> and ICANN should not finalize availability of the TLD unless that RFC
>> exists.
>
>Surely what I
Hey,
Op 27 feb 2024 om 12:08 heeft Toerless Eckert het volgende
geschreven:
> I would like to see a BCP RFC on the use of the "internal" TLD,
> and ICANN should not finalize availability of the TLD unless that RFC
> exists.
Surely what ICANN is preparing to do is make a decision t
Thanks, Paul
My comment:
https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/proposed-top-level-domain-string-for-private-use-24-01-2024/submissions/eckert-toerless-27-02-2024
Summary of Submission:
I would like to see a BCP RFC on the use of the "internal" TLD,
and ICANN shou
Wearing my ICANN hat:
When a topic is in a public comment period, it is very appropriate and
appreciated for community members to send comments in, as Paul Marks has.
Having a discussion on an external forum will have no effect on the public
comment period because the comment from Paul Marks is
11 matches
Mail list logo
